Factors Responsible for Decline of Mughal Empire
Aurangzeb Responsibility
Aurangzeb was responsible for the decline of Mughal empire to a large extend. Even though by the time of his death the empire was vast, he was unable to consolidate his newly conquered territories.
The Deccan Campaign Significantly Contributed towards decline of Mughal Empire. These campaigns started around 1680 and continued till his death in 1707. Aurangzeb personally led this campaign. His obsession to conquer the Deccan weakened the administration of the Mughal Empire and was disastrous for the Mughal treasury.
Aurangzeb also criticized for his intolerant religious policies which marked a significant departure from the policy of tolerant like Akbar. Aurangzeb failed to realize that the stability of vast Mughal Empire depend upon the Support of the people. His religious orthodoxy and his policy towards Hindus damage the stability of the Mughal Empire.
Aurangzeb reimposed Jizya in 1679. He destroyed temples like Kashi Vishwanath Temple, Varanasi Temple and Keshav Rai Temple (Mathura). He forced non-Muslims to convert leading to rebellion which led to execution of the 9th Sikh Guru - Guru Tej Bahadur in 1675. He also adopted Harsh policy towards Rajput's which led to the revolt of the Rajput Kingdom of Mewar and Marwar.
Aurangzeb death led to Mughal throne needed a successor who had exceptional ability to re-established the peace and order but unfortunately who sat on throne lack administrative skills and military abilities need to maintain control over a large empire.
Later Mughal Ruler's
Later Mughal ruler's refers to a series of weak and inefficient Mughal emperor's who ruled after the death of Aurangzeb in 1707 leading to gradual decline of once mighty empire. These rulers are:-
- Md. Azam Shah:- Immediate successor of Aurangzeb who ruled form March to June 1707. He defeated and killed in the battle with his elder Brother Mirza Muhammad Mu'azzam (Bahadur Shah I).
- Bahadur Shah I (1707-1712):- Also known as Shan Alam I, because of his policy of compromised and appeasement he has been called Shah-I-Bekhabar by Khafi Khan the author of book Muntakhab-al-Lubab.
- Jahandar Shah (1712-1713):- He came on the throne with the support of his Nobel Zulfikar Ali Khan who was the leader of Irani party of the Mughal Nobility. Zulfikar Ali Khan was appointed as Waizr-e-Azam. The king remain a puppet of Zulfikar Ali Khan. Jahandar Shah encourage Ijaradari system and abloished Jizya. His mistress, Lal Kunwar imitated the style of Nur Jahah. He was killed by Sayyid Brothers (Abdullah Khan and Hussain Ali Khan Barha).
- Farrukhsiyar (1713-1719):- He got the throne with the support of Sayyid Brothers who came to be acknowledge as king makers. During his rule Sayyid Brothers sign treaty with Marathas the Right's to collect chauth and Sardeshmukhi from the Mughal territories in the Deccan. He was blinded and dethroned by Sayyid Brothers who placed Rafi-ud-Darjat followed Rafi-ud-Daulah (Shah Jahan-II) and finally Md. shah.
- Md . Shah (1719-1748):- His regime witness the rise of independent Kingdom of Hyderabad, Bengal, Awadh and Jats. He was a great patron of performing arts. He was fond of dancing. He practiced Kathak. He has been called Rangella by Khafi Khan. During his rule Nadir Shah also known as Napoleon of Persia invaded and defeated Mughal forces in the Battle of Karnal (Feb 1739). He looted Peacock throne and Kohinoor diamond and took them to Persia.
- Ahmed Shah Bahadur (1748-1754):- During his regime the real control went into the hands of Javed Khan- a handsome eunuch of youthful age and robust personality. His regime witness the first invasion of Ahmed Shah Abdali who invaded India 8 times during the period of 1748 to 1767. He was removed from the throne by his wazir, Imad-ul-Mulk.
- Alamgir II (1754-1759):- His regime witness the Battle of Plassey, 1757. The actual command of the kingdom during Alamgir II rule was in the hands of Imad-ul-Mulk. Later the emperor was murdered by Imad-ul-Mulk and placed Mirza Muhi-ul-Millat on throne who took the title of Shah Jahan III and ruled from 1759 to 1760.
- Shah Alam II (1760-1806):- His real name was Ali Gauhar. His regime witness the 3rd Battle of Panipat, 1761 and Battle of Buxar, 1764. In 1788 he was blinded by one of his nobles, Gulam Kalir who declared Bidar Bakht Md. shah as new ruler who rule by the name of Shah Jahan IV from July 1788 to October 1788. Shah Jahan IV soon dethroned by other nobles of court and reinstated Shah Alam II. It was under the rule of Shah Alam II that the British Forces under the command of Lord Lake captured Delhi in 1803. Shah Alam II was a great poet who wrote by the pen name Aftab.
- Akbar II (1806-1837):- His real name was Jawan Bakht. Hewas allowed to keep the title of Badshah only as curtsey by English East India Compnay. His authority remain confined only in Red Fort of Delhi. He gave the title Raja to Ram Mohan Roy.
- Bahadur Shah II (1837-1862):- The last Mughal Emperor. He died as British pensioner in Rangoor (Burma). Hewas declared as Shahenshah-e-Hindustan by sepoys who revolted against British company in 1857. He was a poet of great merit, who wrote poems by the pen name Zaffar.
Administrative Inefficiency
The local administration which have been effective under strong rulers became increasingly corrupt and inefficient. The revenue collection system deteriorated leading to financial instability. The Mughal Governors known as subedars became increasingly autonomous often acting in their own interest rather then interest of empire.
Economic Crisis
The continuous war and battle since the time of Aurangzeb drain the empire treasury. The cost of maintaining large army and bureaucracy became unsustainable. Agriculture productivity decline due to neglect and over exploitation which further aggravated the crisis.
Military Reasons
The Mughal military by the time of decline Mughal army became outdated and less effective. Their traditional methods and weapons didn't match effectively with emerging powers like Marathas and Britishers. Their inability to established a strong navy allow the European power particularly British to establish their dominance over India.
Foreign Invasion
The Mughal Empire face several invasion from foreign powers. Nadir Shah's invasion of 1739 was devastating as it led to significant lose of wealth and weaken the empire. Subsequent invasion of Ahmed-Shah-Abdali continued to destabilize the Mughal Empire.
European Expansion
The European trading companies particularly the British East India Company bought a new challenge. European power use their superior military strategy and diplomatic alliances to establish control over the Indian territories.
Mansabdari and Jagirdari System
Mansabdari and Jagirdari System were the backbone of Mughal administration and played a crucial role in the rise and expansion of Empire. These System eventually became major reason for decline in 18th century. During the regime of Aurangzeb the number of Mansabdhar increase without the adequate incre`ase in the availability of Jagirs. After Aurangzeb the weak successors failed to control the powerful Mansabdhars
Regional Kingdoms
Regional Kingdom on Bengal
- Murshid Quli Khan
- Suja-ud-din
- Sarajraz Khan
- Alivardi Khan
- Siraj-ud-Daulah
- Mir-Jafar
Murshid Quli Khan
He is the founder of independent kingdom on Bengal. He was the first nawab of Bengal who ruled in this capacity from 1717 to 1727. He established Murshidabad as the capital of Bengal. He built Katra Masjid at Murshidabad after his death he was buried in the premise of the Katra Masjid.
Suja-ud-Din
Successor of Murshid Quli Khan as the nawab of Bengal. He ruled from 1727 to 1739. His regime witness the rise of power and influence of his noble Alivardi Khan. He died in 1739 and was succeeded by his son Sarfaraz Khan, who was defeated and killed in 1740 by Alivardi Khan at the Battle of Giria.
Alivardi Khan
He remain the nawab of the Bengal from 1740 to 1756. He is known for his victory during the Battle of Burdwan in 1747 against the Maratha during the Martha invasion of Bengal. During his regime the European traders and trading companies were welcome for trade and commerce in Bengal. His policies towards them was generous. A British scholar Richard Scrafton writes that Alivardi Khan compare the European merchants to the hive of bees of whose honey must be weed but they should not be disturb because they could stink to death.
Siraj-ud-Daulah
He prohibited European companies from building up their strength and autonomy in Bengal and misusing their privileges. This led to Battle of Plassey fought on 23rd June 1757 between Siraj-ud-Daulah and English East India Company. In this battle he was defeated due to the betrayal of his commander Mir Jafar. he was the last independent nawab of Bengal.
The Regional Kingdom of Awadh
The Kingdom of Awadh was founded by Saadat Ali Khan "Burhan-ul-Mulk". He was appointed as governor of Awadh by Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah during the time of invasion of Nadir Shah. He entered into a secret alliance with Nadir Shah and insisted to Nadir Shah to march towards Delhi in order to extract a much larger indemnity from Md. Shah.
He was followed by his son-in-law the Safdar Jung who became a very powerful figure of the Mughal court during the declining year of the Mughal empire. His Mausoleum in Delhi known as Safdar Jung Tomg one of the finest specimen of the Indo-Islamic architecture in Delhi.
He was followed by his son Shuja-ud-Daulah, who signed the Treaty of Allahabad with British East India Company in 1765. Later he also signed the Treaty of Banaras in 1763 with British East India Company.
He was followed by his son Asaf-ud-Daulah, who shifted the capital of Awadh from Faizabad to Lucknow and he considered as the Architect General of Lucknow. With the ambition to outshine the glory of Mughal architecture he built a number of monuments and developed the city of Lucknow into architectural marvel. He patronized the construction of Rumi Darwaza also known as Turkish Gateway and Bara Imambara. Unlike the Mughal monuments which are known for the use of red sandstone and white marble, the monuments of Lucknow under nawab were built of brick coated with lime.
The Nawab of Awadh Saadat-Ali-Khan Signed the Treaty of Subsidiary alliance with the British in 1801.
The last nawab of Awadh was Wajid-Ali-Shah. Due to his passion for music and dance he significantly contributed toward the development of performing arts in Awadh. He composed many Thumri and was instrumental in the evolution of Lucknow gharana of Kathak.
The Regional Kingdom of Hyderabad
Mir Shahbuddin Khan
Mir Qamaruddin Khan
Mir Nizam Ali Khan
Mir Akbar Ali Khan
Mir Farkhona Ali Khan
Mir Tahniath Ali Khan
Mir Mahbood Ali Khan
Mir Osam Ali Khan
It was founded by Mir Qamaruddin Khan also known as Nizam-ul-Mulk and chin Qalich Khan. He eatablished the Asaf Jhai dynasty that ruled over the kingdom of Hyderabad for the next 7 generations. The Battle of Shakar Kheda fought on 11th October 1724 between the Mughal forces Md. Shah and the forces of Nizam was important conflict that led to establishment of the authority of nizam over Hyderabad. When Nadir Shah invaded in 1729, it was Nizam-ul-Mulk who convinced him to end the violence by his army in the city of Hyderabad. He was followed by series of nizam who acknowledge the subsidiary alliance of British. Nizam Ali Khan sign this alliance in 1789 making Hyderabad the first Indian State to enter into the British system of alliance.
The last nizam of Hyderabad was Osman Ali Khan who surrender his kingdom on 13th sept 1948 after the defeat in Operation Polo conducted by Indian forces for the merger of Hyderabad into the Union of India.
The Regional Kingdom of Punjab
The foundation of independent Punjab kingdom was Maharaja Ranjit Singh, who was the leader of Sukerchakia Misl. He said to be the leader with the modern vision who made Lahore his capital in 1779. He established European style army. Signed the Treaty of Amritsar in 1809. He took Khonir Diamond from Shah Shya the grandson of Ahmed Shah Abdali. He also singed Tripartite Treaty between Shah Shuja and English East India Company. He renovated the Sikh tribe with marble and gold. His death in 1839 was followed by weak successor i.e. Kharak Singh, Naw Nihial Singh, Sher Singh and Dalip Singh. During the time of these rulers the Sikh Kingdom decline and finally British annexed Punjab by defeating the Sikh army in First Anglo-Sikh War, 1845-46 and Second Anglo-Sikh War, 1848-49.
The Regional Kingdom of Jats
In 1669 the Jats launched their Ist significant revolt against the Mughals in the region of Mathura. Gokla was the leader of revolt. Following a series of conflict between Jats and Mughals Churaman and Badam Singh were successful in establishing on independent Jat Kingdom of Bharatpur in 18th century. Under the regime of Maharaja Surajmal (1755 to 1763) the Jat power reach to climax of glory and braveness. He not only establish effective administration but also significantly expanded the states area. His kingdom consisted of Agra, Mathura, Merrut and Aligarh. He built the Lohagarh fort which became one of most powerful fort in India. The British army attempted to conquer the fort 13 times but they could not enter the fort even once. Maharaja Surajmal is known as Plato of Jat tribe and Jat odysseus due to his political vision and intellacult.
The Jat ruler has addicts, after pragmatic relationship with the British which move around the period of resistance and period of alliances. Maharaja Jaswant Singh of Bharatpur provided great Support for the British during the revolt of 1857. In Augh 1947 the state of Bharatpur merge. The last ruler was Maharaja Vajendra Singh.
The Rajput Kingdom of 18th Century
The Rajput State maintain high degree of autonomy during Mughal rule in India. These States were known for their martial tradition patronage of art and tradition. Initially the English East India Company was reluctant to intervein in the affairs of the Rajput Kingdom. It was only after the collapse of Martha power that the British interfere and establish subsidiary alliance with the Rajput Kingdom. Later to coordinate and supervise the relationship between the British govt and these states, Rajputana Agency was established in 1832. It was headed by a British political agent. The first person to be appointed to this post was Abhram Locket. The office of agency was initially established at Ajmer but later transfer to Mount Abu in 1845 because of the administrative convince, climate and strategic consideration. However Ajmer remain a chief commissioner province of British Empire in India.
The most outstanding ruler of the 18th century among the several Rajput state was Raja Sawai Jai Singh of Amer. He performed vedic sacrifices to assert his sovereignty. He built the city of Jaipur which was designed by Vidhya Dhar Bhattacharyya. He has great interest in Mathematics and Astronomy. He establish 5 observatories (Jantar Mantar in Delhi, Jaipur, Uijan, Varashi, and Mathura ). He took steps to abolish sathi and made efforts to encourage the remarriage of widows. He also worked to cure the excessive and wasteful expenditure incurred during the Rajput weeding. He translated Euclid's text on Geometry into Sanskrit.
Independent Kingdom of Mysore
The rise of Mysore as a powerful regional kingdom in south India in 18th century under Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan in one of the most important development of history in peninsular India. Around 1761 Haider Ali become the de facto ruler of Mysore by establishing his influence upon the Wodeyar dynasty. He reorganized the army by producing European style discipline artillery and modern weapons with the help of French experts. In 1765 he establish a modern armory in Dindigul (Tamil Nadu) to produce the modern weapons. After his death in 1788 his son Tipu Sultan introduced several administrative reforms and economic policies so as to make Mysore as one of the most powerful kingdom of it's time.
Tipu Sultan and Haider Ali fought 4 major wars against the English East India Company. These wars resulted in the final defeat of Mysore. A large part of the Mysorian territory was annexed by Britishers. Over smaller part of Mysore they placed a ruled of Wodeyar dynasty and Signed a treaty of Subsidiary Alliance with Britishers.
Carnatic Kingdom
During the Mughal period the Carnatic Subha covers the parts of present day Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. Sanaullah Khan was the last Mughal governor of Carnatic. He also regarded as the first independent nawab of Carnatic.
The Carnatic become region of conflict between English East India Company which led to 3 Carnatic wars fought in the 18th century. These wars resulted in victory of English East India company. Finally the nawab of Carnatic Azim-ud-Daulah sign a treaty of subsidiary alliance with the British. The last nawab of Carnatic is Md. Ghose Khan, who died in 1855 without any biological heir Lord Dalhousie annexed Carnatic on the grounds of Doctrine of Lapse.
Travancore Kingdom
The Kingdom of Travancore existed from 1729 until 1947. It cover the part of modern day Kerala and Tamil Nadu. The founder of the kingdom is Marthanda Varma who fought against the Dutch in the Battle of Colachel, 1741 in which the Dutch forces under the command of De Lennoy was defeated. He donated the wealth of his kingdom to Sree Padmanabha and since his time the ruler's of the Travancore Kingdom are known as Padmanabhadas.
The British didn't directly annexed but brought it under indirect control because it signed subsidiary alliance with British East India Company and it maintain perpetual friendship. This system of alliance allows Britishers to treat the kingdom as while while controlling his military and foreign affairs through a British resident.
Sree Chithira Balarama Varma were the last ruled king of the princely state of Travancore. He was a progressive ruler who implemented major social reforms most notably the temple entry proclamation which allows all Hindus to enter temple. He also established university of Travancore in 1937, modernize the industrial sector of kingdom and expanded public transport. He signed the Instrument of Assertion to join Indian Union ending his ruling power in 1949.
The rise of Maratha in 18th Century
The 18th century witness the remarkable rise of Marathas as most powerful indigenous force in Indian polity specially under the leadership of Peshwas. The period witness the rise of the power and prestige of the Peshwa during rime of Martha Chhatrapati Shahu, who impressed by the ability of Balaji Vishwanath appointed him as a Peshwa in 1730. Balaji Negotiated with the Sayeed Brothers and gain the rights to collect Chauth and Sardeshmukhi in the Mughal provinces of Deccan. This led the foundation of Peshwa supremacy.
By the middle of 18th century, the Marathas under the Peshwas become very powerful. However, their defeat in the 3rd Battle of Panipat led to their decline.
Third Battle of Panipat
The Battle was fought on 14th Jan 1761 between the Maratha forces and the invading army of the Afghan ruler Ahmed Shah Abdali was supported by the Indian allies i.e. Najib-ud-Daulah, the leader of Rohillas and Shuja-ud-Daulah the nawab of Awadh. During the war Maratha Chhatrapati was Raja Ram II who was adopted son of Saho. The actual command of Maratha forces in battle was Sadashiv Rao Bhau (Nephew of the Peshwa Balaji Baji Rao). The nominal command was given to Vishwas Rao (the son of Balaji Baji Rao). Ahmed Shah Abdali win the battle which led to end of the Maratha power in Northern Indian. According to one estimate about 50K Maratha soldiers died in the battle field along with Maratha commanders Vishwas Rao and Sadha shiv Rao. The peshwa himself did not survive after hearing the tragic news of defeat.
One of the most important long term of consequences of the battle was the creation of power vacuum in the Northern India which greatly benefited the British East Indian Company. Over the next few decades the British gradually filled this vacuum and emerged as the dominant power of India.
Expeditions of Europeans
Establishment of Portuguese
The first Portuguese sailor who visited India through new sea route was Vasco Da Gama on 21st May 1498. He landed at Calicut which is considered as one of the major landmarks in the history of India's trade with Europe. After his the second Portuguese sailor who came to India is Alvarez Cabral in 1500. He established a factory at Calicut which become the first European factory in India.
Later the 1st Portuguese fort was built at Kochi in Kerala in 1503. It was name fort Emmanuel. The Portuguese first their headquarters in Kochi on the Malabar coast. Later they shifted it to Goa, in 1530.
In 1505, the Portuguese king established Estado Da India which is the earliest and longest to last European colonial enterprise in Asia. The objective of establishing a Portuguese empire in India was trade of species and textiles and spreading Christianity. Later the Portuguese brought the entire Indian ocean region under through the system of Cartazes i.e. the navigation permits which ships had to obtain from Portuguese authorities to sail in the Indian ocean region.
The affairs of Estado Da India is managed by Portuguese governor appointed by Portuguese crown. These governors had extensive powers to manage military, administrative and commercial affairs of the Portuguese in Indian ocean region. Below the Governors, the captains and other officials responsible for administration of different territories implementing and managing crown policies.
The Portuguese also aims to spread Christianity, Christian missionary were active in converting Indians and establishing Christs and educational institutions. The Portuguese established a separate tribunal called "The Goa Inquisition" in 1560 which continued until 1812. The inquisition primarily focused upon enforcing Christianity upon Indians by torture, imprisonments, death penalties and intimidating the people.
Portuguese Governor in India
In 1505 Francisco De Almeida was appointed as 1st Portuguese viceroy in India. He remains viceroy from 1505 to 1509. He focused the Blue Water policy which aims to strengthen the Portuguese navel supremacy and control over the spice trade of India through the Indian ocean region. His vision was to turn the Indian ocean into a Portuguese sea. The systematic control of the Portuguese over the trade between India and Europe brought them in conflict with the Egyptians, Arabs, Turks and several Indian kingdom. This led to a series of battle, some important being:-
- The Battle of Cannanore, 1506
- The Battle of Chaul, 1508
- The Battle of Diu, 1509 The Battle of Diu was most decisive battle fought between the Portuguese empire and joint fleet of the sultan of Gujrat, the saltant of Egypt and the La Zemori of Calicut. The Portuguese emerged victorious and the grand Islamic alliance was defeated. This victory established the Portuguese naval supremacy over the Indian ocean region and it marked the beginning of European colonialisms in Asia. The Second Portuguese governor is Alfouso De Albuquerque. He remain the Portuguese viceroy from 1509 to 1550. He is considered as the real founder of Portuguese power in India. In 1510 he captured Goa from the Bijapur Saltant. He built a Portuguese part at Bhatkal in Karnataka with the permission of Vijayanagar ruler ruler Krishna deva Rai. He abolished the practice of Sati system in Goa. He died in 1550 in Goa and was buried there. Another popular Portuguese governor in India is Nano Da Cunha. He held the position from 1529 to 1538. He signed the Treaty of Bassein in 1534 with the sultan Badhur shah of Gujrat who gave him island of Bassein including surrounding area like Daman and Diu. He established Goa as a Portuguese headquarters in 1530. Martin Alfonso De Souza was the Portuguese governor from 1542 to 1545. During his tenure in India a Christian missionary St. Francis Xavier who also a cofounder of society of Jesus (Jesuits) visited India in 1542. He learned the local language and made sincere efforts in the conversion of thousands of people to Christianity. He died in 1552 on a island in China. His remains were buried in a church of Goa. He initiated the efforts for bringing the printing press to India which was brought in 1556 and was established at Saint Paul's Collage, Goa. He considered as the lord of Goa and an annual festival is celebrated for him even today by the people of Goa.
Factors Responsible for the decline of Portuguese power in India
One of the major reason for decline was inefficiency and corruption found in the Portuguese administration system in India. The officials appointed to manage the affairs were incapable and corrupt. The lack of long term vision and their policies were primarily aim at extracting wealth rather than consolidating power.
The emergence of new European power become a threat to Portuguese supremacy. The Dutch, British and French arrived in India with superior military abilities and both organized commercial enterprise. The British defeated in the Battle of Swally, 1612. This battle mark the beginning of the end of Portuguese commercial monopoly over the Indian ocean region. The Dutch took over the Portuguese territories in Sri Lanka and Indonesia.
Another significant factor was the religious intolerance practiced by the Portuguese which caused strong discontent amongst the local population. It led to social unrest making it challenging for the Portuguese to maintain the political stability.
Unlike the British who systematically expanded their territorial control through alliances, wars and diplomacy, the Portuguese remain confined to their initial strong holds. They failed to established a vast inland empire and remain in the costal area. This limited territorial presence make them vulnerable to attacks and reduce their political influence.
The Portuguese remains culturally isolated from the Indian people. The racial arrogance prevented them from integrating with the local culture which was essential for long term dominance.
The Portuguese Contributions
The Portuguese introduced several new crops and commodities in India which have a lasting impact on Indian culture and cuisine, notably among them were red chilies, cashew nuts, tabacoo, pineapple, papaya, guava.
The Portuguese were key players in trade of Indian textile particularly cotton fabrics which was highly valued in Europe and spread across Asia. The Portuguese played a major role in the spread of Christianity particularly Catholicism. The Christian missionaries such as St. Francis Xavier were active in converting the local population specially in Goa, Kerala and parts of Tamil Naidu.
The Portuguese presence in India led to cultural synthesis in the region were we had strong presence such as Goa. The Portuguese language made a strong impact on Konkani language spoken in Goa which we find many Portuguese words. Similarly the Goa cuisine with dishes like Vindaloo, Bebinca reflect a fusion of Indian and Portuguese tradition.
The Portuguese colonial architecture left a significant impact on India. The construction of church, forts and houses in the Indo-Portuguese style is a hall mark of the Portuguese. The notable examples includes Basilica on Bom Jesus, the Sea Cathedral and the church of St. Cajetan in Goa which are UNISCO recognized world heritage site.
The art of printing first came to India when the Portuguese brought the printing press in the 16th century. The 1st book printed in Indian language was Thambiran Vanakkam published in Tamil. It was 16 page translation of a doctrine on Christianity.
Dutch
The Dutch were the people of Netherlands who came to India in the form of a company that means The Dutch East India Company established in 1602. This company is considered as the first Multi-national company and the first company to issue stocks. It was established under the leadership of the Dutch statesman Johan van Oldenbarnevelt. It played an important role in establishing Dutch colonial rule in the parts of Asia including the present day Indonesia.
Unlike the Portuguese who focused primarily on trade in species, the Dutch focus mainly on trade in textile from the Coromandel Coast region. Apart from textiles they also trade items like indigo, rice, opium, saltpeter. The first Dutch settlement in India was found at Masulipatnam (Andhra Pradesh) in 1605. The land for the settlement was granted by sultan of Golconda. Later they founded another settlement as Devanampattinam (Tamil Naidu) which come to be known as the Fort St. David under the British. Pulicat was another important Dutch settlement established in 1692 where they build their headquarters. Later they transfer their headquarters in Negapatam in 1687.
The Dutch founded several minor settlement in western India at places such as Surat, Bharuch, Bombay and Ahmedabad. They established their factory in Patna in 1632 to trade in saltpeter which was an essential ingredient in making gun powder. Later they established a factory at Chinsurah (Fort Gustavus) at Kasim Bazar. The position of Dutch in India depended on the superiority of their naval power. They broke the Portuguese monopoly by using naval power but they failed against the British. In the Battle of Bedara, 1759 the British forces defeated the Dutch finally by the Anglo-Dutch treaty of 1824, Netherlands surrender all their possessions on the Indian subcontinent and the rights associated with them to the British.
In terms of their impact upon India the Dutch are given the credit of popularizing the trade in Coromandel Chintz that means a primitive multi color fabric with glazed finished. They also contributed to the Indian architecture by constructing the Tombs at cemetery in Surat and Kasim Bazar.
Britishers
The coming of British to India Ralph Fitch an English merchant and traveler was one of the first British to visit India and other part of Asia. His visit in India took place in 1583 during the regime of the Mughal emperor Akbar.
In 1600 a group of English merchant who called themselves "Merchant Adventurous" formed a company name the Governor and Company of Merchants of London Trading into the East Indies. The company was issued a charter by the British queen Elizabeth I on 31st Dec 1600 with the rights of exclusive trade in East Indies. The charter initially gave the company a 15 year monopoly on trade. In 1609 a new charter extended the monopoly rights of the company for a indefinite period.
By the late 17th century the company faced a rival in the form of "General Society trading to the East Indies". It was another British company formed in 1698. In 1702 the two rivals companies merged under the name "The United Company of Merchants of England trading to the East Indies". This merger was facilitated by an act of parliament. However, despite the formal change in name, the popular name "English East India Company" continued.
Major Settlement of English East India Company in India
In 1608 captain William Hawking visited India, he arrived at Surat in a ship name Hector. he visited to the Mughal court at Agra and was received with all Indian hospitality the emperor Jahangir. He was able to prosecute the emperor to grant the British permission for establishing a factory at Surat but the permission was soon withdrawn due to influence of Portuguese in the Mughal court. However the victory of British forces over Portuguese at Swally in 1612 broke the tradition of Portuguese naval supremacy and a farman was issued by Jahangir permitting the English to establish a factory at Surat in 1613.
The British company established first factory in India in 1611 at Masulipatnam. However the factory was temporary later they established their first permanent factory at Surat. Later in 1619 they established another factory at Broach present day Bharuch in Gujrat and Ahmedabad.
In 1615, Sir Thomas Roe come to India as a companies representative and live in Agra till 1619. He succussed in getting two farman one from Jahangir and second form his son Khurram which gave permission to trade and build factories in different parts of Mughal empire.
By 1630, Surat become the companies headquarters on the western coast on India. It was finally replaced by Bombay as the headquarter of company in 1687. In 1662 Portuguese gave Bombay as a part of dowry to their princess Catherine of Braganza on her marriage with Charles II, the king of England. The company took Bombay from Charles II in 1668 on lease. Gerald Aungier the companies governor of Bombay from 1669 to 1677 is the true founders of the Bombay's greatness. It was during his tenure that small island town of Bombay was converted into a promising hub for Thomas.
In peninsular India, company began his trade with the establishment of settlement at Masulipatnam in 1611. In 1639 the companies servant Francis Day obtained the site of Madras from Venkata Raya the king of Vijayanagar. Here company built fort St. Gorge. Madras replaced Masulipatnam as the headquarters of the company on the Coromandel cost in 1641.
In the eastern coast of India the British established their first factories at Balasore and Hariharpara in Odisha in 1633. Later they also formed their establishment at Hugli, Patna, Dhaka and Kasim Bazar. The major commodities of export by the company from the Bengal in the middle of 18th century were cotton and silk textile, saltpeter and opium. Job Charnock the companies employ established on English factory at Sutanuti in Bengal in 1691. He is regarded as the founder of the city of Kolkata. In 1698 the company was permitted by Azim-ush-Shan (Governor of Bengal) to purchase the Zamindari of 3 villages of Sutanuti, Kalikata and Govindpur. This marked the foundation of Calcutta where British established fort William and which became the British capital in 1722.
Danish
The days followed the Portuguese the Dutch and the British they came to India as a company in 1616. After landing on the Indian mainland the Dutch company established their settlement in the town of Tranquebar (Tharangambadi, Tamil Naidu). The Dutch settlement established here in 1620 and it come to be known as fort Dansborg. Later they established their settlement at Frederiksnagore (present day Srirampur in Bengal). This place served as the Danish headquarter in India.
Later in 1799 the Christian missionary William Corey, William Ward and Joshua Marshman together known as Serampore Trio established a press at this place which play a significant role in education and printing Christian literature in India.
Unlike the other European counter parts the Danish trading operation in India were on a much smaller scale. They had few trading posts and factories which restricted their abilities to control the trade route and markets. They lack military resources and manpower. Unlike British and French who formed strategic alliances with powerful local rulers and played a significant role in the political affairs of the Indian kingdom, the Danish did not established strong political relationship with the Indian rulers.
Ultimately the British took over the possessions of Danish settlements in India when Danish sold their port at Serampore in 1839 and Tranquebar in 1845.
The French
The French East India company was founded in 1664 under the patronization of king Loui XIV and his finance minister Jean Colbert. It established it's first settlement in India in 1667 at Surat and 1674 at Pondicherry as their headquarters in India and they built fort St. Loui at this place. Before the French the Portuguese were the first European to established their settlement at Pondicherry which later under the control of Dutch till 1654. The Frenchman who is given the credit of transferring Pondicherry into major settlement is Francois Martin.
In Bengal the French laid the foundation of their major settlement at Chandan Nagar in 1690. At a place granted to them by Shaista Khan (The Mughal subedar of Bengal).
The appointment of Dupleix as the French Governor General in India in 1742 led to beginning of Anglo-French conflict which resulted in Carnatic wars (1749-1763).
The first Carnatic War (1746-48) was resulted to the war of the Austrian succession where Britain and France were from the opposite side. It ended with the Treaty of Aix La Chapelle. Under the treaty Madras was return to British and peace was restored in India.
The Second Carnatic War (1749-54) was the result of the interference of English East India Company and French English East India Company in the dispute of succession in Carnatic and Hyderabad. In the Carnatic the British supported Md. Ali and the French supported Chanda Sahab. In Hyderabad the British supported Nasir Jung and French supported Muzaffar Jung. The two important battle of this war were:
- Battle of Ambur, 1749
- Battle of Areot, 1751 The war ended in 1754 with the Treaty of Pondicherry which established Md. Ali as the nawab of Carnatic and Salabat Jung (Allie of French) as the nizam of Hyderabad. The third Carnatic war (1757-63) was part of seven year war fought between the Britain and France. One of the most decisive battle of this war was the Battle of Wandiwash in which British forces the command of Sir Eyre Coote defeated the French forces under the command of Count de Colly was ended with Treaty of Paris 1763 that ended French supremacy position over the Indian subcontinent.
Battle of Plassey
The Battle of Plassey fought on 23rd June 1757 was a decisive conflict between the English East India Company and the nawab of Bengal Siraj-ud-Daula. This battle marked the beginning British political dominance in India.
The British company wanted to expand its commercial interest in India. They were keen on securing favorable trading conditions. Siraj-ud-Daula who became the nawab of Bengal stop the company form misuse of its power and privileges. This created on immediate background for the conflict between nawab and company.
Before the Battle of Plassey Clive of can conspired with Mir Zaffar (Commander of the nawab's army) on the date of the Battle of Clive carefully plant the military strategy for confronting the forces of Siraj-ud-Daula. Moreover, a heavy sudden monsoon rain struck the battle field and this unexpected rain became a critical turning point in battle directly favoring Britishers.
The battle commenced on 23rd June 1757 Nawab's forces were significantly larger than the British. However, Mir Zaffar and his troops abstained form fighting. This act betrays weakened the army of Siraj-ud-Daula. Therefore the British despite less being in numbers secured decisive victory due to their diplomacy and betrayal within the Siraj-ud-Daulah nobility.
The victory at Plassey marked the beginning of British political dominance in India. Mir Zaffar became the nawab of Bengal but he was puppet ruler controlled by the British. This victory gave the company significant advantage allowing them to dictate terms to the nawab and effectively control Bengal's administration. The Battle's after mark showed the transfer of immense wealth to the company. The victory enhance the companies military and strategic position in India. The battle also demonstrated the effectiveness of the European diplomacy against a larger Indian force setting a president for the future conflict.
Battle of Buxar
Battle of Buxar was fought on 22nd Oct 1764 between the English East India Company and the allied forces of Mir Qasim, Shah Alam II and Shuja-ud-Daulah. The primary cause of the battle was the conflict between the company and Mir Qasim for control over Bengal. It is said that Mir Qasim was the last nawab of Bengal who tried to rule independent. In 1763, the company removed Mir Qasim and appointed Mir Zaffar as the nawab of Bengal which created a immediate cause for the battle.
In the Battle the allied forces were defeated by the company forces fighting under the command of Major Hector Manuro. The Battle proof itself to be a turning point in the history of Bengal in particular and India in general. The British after battle became the undisputed and the real masters of Bengal, Bihar and Odisha.
In 1765, Shuja-ud-Daulah and Shah-Alam II signed the treaties of Allabhad with Robert Khalif (Governor of Bengal). In the first treaty of Allabhad signed with Shuja-ud-Daulah, the nawab had to pay a compensation of ₹ 53 lakh and surrender the territories of Kara and Allabhad. In the second treaty of Allabhad with Shah Alam II, the Mughal emperor had to grant the British Diwani rights of Bengal, Bihar, Odisha in exchange of ₹ 26 lakh/annum to be paid by the company to Mughal Emperor. After the battle during the period of period of 1765-1772 the form of government witness in Bengal has been called the dual government of Bengal. Under this form of government company got all the power without any responsibility whereas the nawab and Mughal emperor had all the responsibilities without any power. As the Diwan the company was authorized to collet the revenue. The company appointed Md. Raza Khan and Raja Shitab Rai on the post of deputy diwan to collect the revenue because the nawab of Bengal was the puppet to the company. The company also enjoy the Nizamat rights i.e. Right to maintain law and order. In this context company appointed Md. Raza Khan as deputy Nizam. Later in 1772, Warren Hastings abolished the dual system of government and Bengal was brought under the direct control of the British.
Anglo-Mysore War: Causes and Consequences
The Anglo-Mysore wars were a series of conflicts between the English East India Company and the kingdom of Mysore ruled by Haider Ali and later Tipu Sultan.
Four Wars were fought between them:-
- The Ist Anglo-Mysore War, 1767-79 ended with the Treaty of Madras.
- The IInd Anglo-Mysore War, 1780-84 ended with the Treaty of Mangalore.
- The IIIrd Anglo-Mysore War, 1790-92 ended with Treaty of Seringapatam.
- The IVth Anglo-Mysore War, 1799.
Causes of Anglo-Mysore War
- The English East India Company wanted to expand its territories and influence in southern India. They aim to control the important trade route and parts of southern India which was important for their commercial interests. Mysore's strategic location make it a critical region. The control over which was necessary to maintain the British hold over Madras.
- Haider Ali and his son Tipu Sultan were becoming a challenge to the British efforts of expanding their influence upon the peninsular India Haider Ali effective military strategy and alliances become a threat to British. Tipu Sultan popularly known as Tiger of Mysore continued his father legacy of resisting the British effort of expansion. His modernized army, use of rocket artillery and effort's to form alliances with the foreign powers was seen as a direct threat by the British.
- The Global Rivalry btw British and the French also played the role. The French supported Mysore considering Haider Ali and Tipu sultan as valuable allies against the British.
- Mysore's conflict with the neighboring kingdoms like the Marathas and Nizam of Hyderabad also played a Role. These regional powers often shifted their alliances influencing the course of Anglo-Mysore war
- Mysore was rich in resources like spices, silk and sandalwood which were highly valuable to the British for trade.
Important Treaties and Important Battles
- Treaty of Madras
- Signed in 1769
- It ended 1st Anglo-Mysore war
- It included:- Mutual Agreement between the parties to return the conquered territories and prisoners to each other and the promise to assist each other if attacked by other power.
- Battle of Pollilur - 1780
- It was part of 2nd Anglo-Mysore war
- The Battle witnessed extensive use of Mysorean rockets. The company suffered high no. of casualties. The credit for the victory of Mysore's army in this battle is given to Tipu sultan
- Battle of Porto Novo 1781
- Part of 2nd Anglo-Mysore war where the British forces led by Sir Eyre Coote defeated the Mysorean forces
- Treaty of Manglore
- signed in 1784 as a peace treaty between Tipu Sultan and English East India Compnay under the treaty both the side agreed to end the war and restore the conquered territories and prisoners of each other.
- Treaty of Seringapatam
- signed in 1792
- ending the 3rd Anglo-Mysore war
- The Main terms included :-
- Tipu surrendering half of his Kingdom to the victorious allies that is British, Marathas, Nizams. He also agreed to pay a huge war compensation and sent 2 sons as hostages under the company to ensure the complete payment.
- Battle of Seringapatam, 1799
- It was the final and decisive clash of 4th Anglo-Mysore war where the company forces under the command of Arthur Wellesley supported by Nizams and Marathas defeated forces of Tipu Sultan leading to the death of Tipu Sultan.
Consequences
- The company's victory in the war resulted in significant territorial gains. It enhanced their dominance in southern India and removed a major obstacle to the British expansion in the south.
- Mysore kingdom was re-organized. A large part of the kingdom was annexed by the victorious allies while the rest was restored to Wadiyar dynasty under the British Paramountcy.
- The Marathas and Nizams who had allied the British were now more dependent upon British.
- The British success in Mysore set a precedent for their subsequent conquest & annexation including Maratha empire and other regional power
- The struggle of Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan emerged as a symbol of Resistance against the British colonial Rule. Their efforts to modernize the military and fight against the British domination inspire the future generation of Indian nationalist.
Legacy of Tipu Sultan
- The question of whether Tipu Sultan was a religious Boycott is a topic of significant historical debate. In this context, there are historical accounts & records which tell that Tipu Sultan persecuted Christians and Hindus in certain parts of their kingdom However, despite being a devout Muslim he supported the Christianity tradition of Sufism. He supported and patronized the Hindu temples. He provided grants & donations to several temples including the famous Sri Rangam Temple of Karnataka.
- Tipu Sultan reign was also characterized by its struggles against British, administrative reform and ambitious territorial aspirations. He was a man of progressive ideas. He enlisted himself as the member of Jacobins club. He established a branch of Jacobins club in 1794. He declared himself as Citizen Tipu. He planted a tree of Liberty at his capital at Seringapatam. He sent emissaries to Arabia, Kabul, constantinople, versailles and Mauritius.
- However, the limitation of Tipu Sultan is witnessed in his ambitions which alienated the neighboring states such as Marathas and the Nizam of Hyderabad. These regional powers were threatened by his aggressive and expansionist policies. Moreover, his reliance on French support was undermined by the changing political scenario in Europe during the French Revolution.
- Finally, Tipu Sultan legacy is multifaceted reflecting both his achievement and his failure of diplomacy
Treaty of Subsidiary Alliance
States to sign Subsidiary Alliance
- Nizam of Hyderabad, 1798
- Mysore and Tanjore, 1799
- Nawab of Awadh, 1801
- Maratha Peshwa, 1802
- Bhonsle, 1803
- Sindhya of Gwalior 1804
Main principles of Subsidiary Alliance
- An Indian Ruler entering into subsidiary alliance with the British had to accept the British forces within his territory and also agree to pay its expenses with either money or territory to company for the maintenance of troops.
- The Ruler had to accept the appointment of a British Representative called Resident at the capital of their state who would oversee all negotiations and communication with other states meaning that the other state ruler was to have no direct negotiation or relation with other state without the Resident’s Approval.
- The Indian Ruler who had entered into alliance would not enter into any other alliance with any other power, nor would he declare war against any power without the permission of British
- The Ruler would not employ any European other than British and if he were doing already, so he would dismiss them.
- In case of conflict with any other state he would agree to the resolution decided upon by the British.
- The Ruler would acknowledge the British crown as paramount power in India
- In Return for the Ruler accepts these conditions, the company promised to protect from external threat and internal disorder.
Anglo-Maratha War: Causes and consequences
The Anglo - Maratha war fought b/w British EEIC and Marathas from 1775 to 1818 were the significant conflicts that shaped the course of the Indian history.
These wars resulted in eventual end of the Maratha power and the establishment of British supremacy in the Deccan Region of South India.
Causes
- The EEIC aim to expand its territory and influence in India. The Maratha empire being a significant power in Western and Central India became a challenge to the British expansionist ambitions
- The British wanted to establish their rule over major trade routes and ports particularly in the western coastal region of India which was under the control of Marathas
- The Death of Maratha Peshwa Madhav Rao I in 1772 led to a succession dispute amongst the Maratha chiefs which provided an opportunity to the British to interfere.
- The conflicts in the Maratha confederacy made it vulnerable to external intervention.
1st Anglo - Maratha War (1775-1782)
The British support for Raghunath Rao as Peshwa and internal conflict within Maratha empire led to the outbreak of the 1st war. In the initial phase of the war the Marathas achieve a significant victory forcing the British to sign the Treaty of Wadgaon (1779) and Salbai (1782). The British agreed to withdraw support to Raghunath Rao and recognize Madhav Rao II as the legitimate peshwa. The British returned all the captured Maratha territories including Salestte and Bharuch except Bassein.
In return the Marathas restored to the British the territories they had captured in Bengal and Bombay Presidency. Both the side agreed to not interfere in each other affairs and maintain peace.
2nd Anglo-Maratha War (1803-1805)
The Treaty of Bassein signed in 1802 became a immediate back ground for this war. It was signed between the British and Peshwa Balaji Rao II. The Treaty made the Peshwa a British Puppet. This was opposed by other Maratha chiefs which led to conflict. The British forces under the command of Arthur Wellesley achieved decisive victory over the Maratha forces in the Battles of Assaye and Argaon (1803).
After the defeat the Maratha chiefs were forced to surrender the territory to British which weakened their power & influence. The Maratha chiefs like Bhonsle signed the Treaty of Deogaon 1803, Sindhia signed the treaty of Sri Arigaon 1803, Rajpughal treaty by Holkars in 1805.
3rd Anglo-Maratha (1817-1818)
The Marathas attempted to regain their lost territory and power leading to the outbreak of the
war.
The British wanted to eliminate the Maratha threat once and for all and establish their dominance over the southern part of subcontinent.
The British launched a series of military campaigns decisively defeating Marathas. The Defeat of Marathas led to annexation of Peshwa territory and Dissolution of Maratha Confederacy. Peshwa Bajirao II was dethroned and pensioned off to Bithur near Kanpur where he died in 1851.
Consequences of Anglo-Maratha War
- The Maratha empire which was once a dominant power in India was reduced to a collection of princely states under British paramountcy. The Peshwa was deposed and the Maratha chiefs lost their political autonomy. A significant part of the kingdom was annexed by British which weakened the Marathas power base.
- The EEIC expanded its control over the large part of India including Maharashtra, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh. This territorial expansion solidified the British dominance in the Indian subcontinent. The British established a new administrative structure to govern the annex territory integrating them into British colonial framework.
- The British implemented a new revenue policy to extract resources from the annexed territories. The traditional agrarian economy was disrupted leading to economic hardship for the local population
- The resistance of the Maratha against the British colonialism inspired the future generation of Indian Nationalist. The leaders like Tilak and the revolutionaries like Chapekar brothers inspired from Maratha struggles
- The Maratha warrior like the Peshwa and Chhatrapati became the symbol of National pride and resistance against foreign make their legacy continue to inspire contemporary moment for social and political Justice.
Treaty and Battles of Anglo-Maratha War
Battle of Wadgaon, 1779
The part of first Anglo-Maratha war were Maratha forces led by Mahadji Scindia and Tukoji Rao Holkar defeated British forces. The British had to sign a treaty of Wadgaon in 1779.
Battle of Assaye, 1803
It was the part of second Anglo-Maratha war in which the British forces led by Arthur Wellesley defeated the Maratha forces led by Daulat Rao Sindhia and Raghu ji Bhosle.
Battle of Karegaon, 1818
A major battle fought during the third Anglo-Maratha war in which British were led by Captain Francis fought a much larger Maratha army led by Peshwa Baji Rao II. This battle remember as a symbol of dalit resistance and pride. To commemorate the victory, the company commission a victory pillar in karegaon.
Treaty of Surat, 1775
It was an arrangement between British East India company and Raghunath Rao in which he agreed to surrender Salsette and Bassen to the British in exchange of 2500 British soldiers to regain power leading to fist Anglo-Maratha war. However, the Calcutta council annulled the treaty leading to Treaty of Turendhar 1776.
Treaty of Salbai, 17th May 1782
Signed between the Marathas and the company. It led to the end of first Anglo-Maratha war and established peace between two parties that lasted 20 years until second Anglo-Maratha war
Treaty of Basseim, 31st Dec 1802
Signed between the company and Maratha Peshwa Baji Rao II. It was subsidiary alliance treaty which became the immediate cause of second Anglo-Maratha war.
Treaty of Devagon, 17th Dec 1803
Signed between the English East India company and Raghu ji Bhosle. It force the Bhosle dynasty to accept the British resident and subsidiary force in Nagpur making them dependent on Britishers.
Treaty of Suri Arjargaon, 30th Dec 1803
Signed between company and Daulat Rao Scindia which make the Scindia's dependent upon the British as a British protectorate.
Treaty of Rajpurghat, 24th Dec 1805
Signed between company and Yashwant Rao Horka which led to end of second Anglo-Maratha war and weakened the Maratha confederacy
Treaty of Poona, 1817
It was the main treaty of the war which significantly reduce the power and authority of Peshwa Baji Rao II.
Treaty of Mandsore, 6th Jan 1818
Signed between Malhar Rao of Indore and the company. It mark the end of Horka's resistance in the third Anglo-Maratha war.
Anglo-Nepal War, 1846
Anglo-Nepal war also known as Gorkha war. It was a military conflict between the company and kingdom on Nepal rule by the Gorkhas. This was marked the first direct confederation between the company and kingdom on Nepal. The background of the war was the expansionist policies of the Gorkhas towards the mainland of India especially in the foothills of the Himalayas. The war ended with the treaty of Sughlei, 1816 under which Nepal Surrender Kumanon, Gardhwal, Sikkim and some part of Terai region of India. A British resident was appointed in Katmandu to increase the British influence. Nepal agreed not to interfere with the affairs of its neighbors or engage in war with them. The British began recruiting the Gorkha soldiers in their army.
Anglo-Sindh War: Causes and Consequences
The Anglo-Sindh war was a crucial conflict between the company and Sindh in 1843. These wars resulted in British annexation of Sindh and played a significant role in the British expansion of British rule in India.
Causes
- The English East India Company aim to secure and expand its territories in India. Moreover, Sindh's strategic position with its proximity with the Indus river and the Arabian sea made it a valuable asset for controlling trade routes.
- The British also wanted to establish a foothold in Sindh to secure the north-western frontier territory so as to counter the potential threat from the Russian invasion through Afghanistan.
- One more reason of annexation was the defeat of British in the First Anglo-Afghan war (1839-42). This defeat crated a need for conquest so as to compensate loss of prestige after humiliation suffered in the war.
Major Events in the Anglo-Sindh conflict
- The first moves was towards diplomatic alliance with Sindh, made by Lord Minto I who signed a treaty in 1809 with Amirs of Sindh.
- The second move was made in 1832 when Lord Willian Bentick and Amirs of Sindh singed a treaty which was commercially singed for the British as it allowed the company to use the roads and rives passing through Sindh.
- The third important move was made by Lord Auckland whose Sindh policy contains and element of aggressiveness. He looked upon Sindh as a territory with strategic location where the control of British is need to strengthen the defense of British in India. In 1838 he signed a Treaty of Tripartite alliance with Maharaja Ranjit Singh and Shah Shuja. The treaty removed 2 major influence upon Sindh that is Punjab and Afghanistan. The treaty ended with Shah Shuja's nominal claim of sovereignty over Amirs of Sindh through the treaty of Britishers emerged as mediator in case of conflict between Maharaja Ranjit and Amirs of Sindh. Finally, in 1839 the Amirs of Sindh signed a Treaty of Subsidiary Alliance.
- The last move taken by the Lord Ellen Borough. He appointed Charles Napier as the resident in 1842 who played an instrumental role in annexation of Sindh. He initiated the policy of putting blames over the Amirs of Sindh on the ground that they has hostile intentions towards company. Finally on the bases of some fake letters of Amis he created the immediate cause of annexation of Sindh in 1843. Sindh was finally annexed after the defeat of Amirs in the Battle of Miani, Feb 1843 and the Battle of Dubbo also known as the Battle of Hyderabad in March 1843.
- Napier inform about the victory over the Sindh to Ellen Brough with a short message Peccavi (The Latin for I has sinned). Napier wrote in his diary "We have no right to cease Sindh yet we do so and a very advantageous useful, human peace of rascality it will be".
Anglo-Sikh War
The Anglo-Sikh war was a series of conflict between the company and rulers of Sikh which ultimately led to annexation of Punjab into British India.
Causes of Anglo-Sikh War
- The British company was keen to expand its territory in India. Punjab with its fertile land and strategic location was beneficial. Dalhousie who is considered as a great imperialist of the queen Victoria's reign (1819-1901) and if there happen any possibility of annexation of Indian state he did not miss it.
- The conquest of Punjab was also the result of growing Anglo-Russian rivalry and the consequent British fear that Russia might attack India through NWF region.
- The death of Maharaja Ranjit Singh in 1835 created a power vacuum in Punjab. His strong leadership maintain stability but his death led to coming of a series of weak successors. During the time of weak rulers. The Sikh court at Lahore became of battleground for different factions fighting for power which created an environment of instability and chaos.
- Despite, the internal instability the Sikh army known as Khalsa remain a formidable force. The British considered it a potential threat. Frequent conflict at the border between the Sikh and company forces escalated the tensions between the two making conflict inevitable.
- The Treaty of Amritsar 1809 also known as Minto-Metcalfe treaty between Maharaja Ranjit Singh and Charles Metcalfe representing the company was established boundaries between the Sikh empire and British India. However, violating and different interpretation of treaties led to disputes and rising tensions.
1st Anglo-Sikh War (1845-1846)
The Battle of Mudki (Dec, 1845) was the first major engagement. It resulted in British victory but both the side suffer heavy causality.
The Battle of Sabraon, 1846 was the final battle it resulted in British victory and collapse of Sikh resistances. The war ended with the signing of treaty of Lahore 1846 which impose severe terms of Sikh empire. The treaty requires Sikh to surrender territory, disband much of their army and pay a large compensation to British. The treaty also allow for the appointment of British resident in Lahore effectively placing Punjab under British control.
2nd Anglo-Sikh War (1848-49)
The harsh term of Treaty of Lahore and the presence of British officials in Punjab caused widespread resentment among Sikh. Various Sikh leaders and military factions this satisfied with British interference rose in rebellion by Sikh governor of Multan in 1848 marked the beginning of 2nd Anglo-Sikh war.
The Battle of Chillianwala (Jan 1849)
It was one of the toughest battle fought by the company. In the battle the British suffered Many casualities.
The Battle of Gujrat (Feb 1849)
It was a decisive battle of war resulting in the final defeat of Sikh forces also known of Battle of Guns due to decisive and extensive use of British artillery which settled the Sikh army's defense.
Maharaja Duleep Singh and his mother Rani Jindan were sent away to London on a fixed annual pension. The famous Kohinoor diamond went in to the British hand.
Three phases of British exploitation
The economic exploitation of India under the British rule evolve over time in three major phases are
- Mercantilism
- Free Trade Capitalism
- Finance Capitalism Each phase changes reflect in British economic interest but core objective remains same i.e. maximum extraction of wealth from India.
Mercantilism Phase
The first phase i.e. Mercantilism roughly between 1757 to 1813 began after the Battle of Plassey when English East India Company gain the political control. In simple terms mercantilism meant that Britain wanted to accumulate wealth by controlling trade. The company collected land revenue from peasants and used that money to buy Indian goods like textile which was exported to Europe. This system is often called investment but in reality it was exploitation because Indians were not pay fairly and India's wealth was being used to purchase the goods that were sold in England. At same time Indian artisan suffers because British policy supports export of Indian goods at the cheaper price. This phase marked the beginning of drain of wealth from Indian to Britain.
Free Trade Capitalism phase
The second phase of the free trade capitalism (1838 to 1858) started after the Charted of 1830 and ended with the companies monopoly over Indian trade. Now India was open to British private merchant and industries. The nature of exploitation change. Britain, which has undergone the Industrial revolution began exporting machine made goods to India. Indian handicrafts specially textile could not compete with cheap factory products from Britain leading to deindustrialization in India. Many artisans last their livelihood and were forced into agriculture increasing pressure on land. At the same time India was turned into a supplier of raw materials like cotton, indigo and jute for British industries thus India become market for British goods and source of raw material for British industries while its own industry decline.
Finance Capitalism phase
The third phase of finance capitalism began when British crown took direct control of India after the revolt of 1857. In this phase the focus shifted from trade to investment and financial control. British capital was invested in railways, plantations, banks and infrastructure mainly to secure British interests.
These projects were financed through loans and India had to pay heavy interest which further drained its wealth. There was a continuous home charges system where India pay for British administration, pension and war.
British Land Revenue Settlement
The land revenue is a tax or revenue levied on agriculture production upon land. In 1765 British acquired the Diwani rights of Bengal, Bihar and Odisha. Till 1772 during the time of dual government in Bengal were in the hands of the Indian officials called Niab Diwans. The first two Niab Diwans were Md. Raza Khan and Raja Shitab Rai. In 1772 Lord Warren Hastings introduced Quinquennial settlement. By this system any bidder who promised to pay the highest amount of revenue from an area was given that land for 5 years, that bidder collected land revenue from villagers and paid to the company authority. As the system proved dangerous Hastings also experimented with annual settlement and appointed Amini Commission in 1776 to make an evaluation of India's land resources so that a fair land revenue settlement could be formulated. This led to introduction of new settlement such as
- Permanent Settlement
- Ryotwari Settlement
- Mahalwari Settlement
Permanent Settlement
It was first introduced in Bengal and Bihar by Lord Cornwallis in 1793. It was later extended to Odisha, northern district of Madras and districts of Varanasi. The main aim was to create a stable and predictable source of revenue for the country. Under this settlement Zamindar were responsible for paying the revenue on time to the company. If he failed to pay his revenue on or before the fixed date he would be removed from his Zamindari. The revenue demand between the company and Zamindar were fixed permanently. Zamindars were recognized as owners of land. They were granted hereditary rights over the land. The fixed revenue ensure a stable predictable income for the British but high revenue demand and pressure to pay a fixed amount led to widespread exploitation of peasants, who fell in debt and poverty.
This system created a class of Zamindars who had significant control over the rural society contributed to social stratification and inequality. The exploiting practices of the Zamindar caused severe distress leading to landlessness and increase rural poverty. The permanent revenue demand discourage Zamindar from investing in land leading to stagnation in agriculture productivity.
One of the consequences of the settlement was increase in litigation due to the removal of the courtiers and extension of the right of appeal.
Ryotwari Settlement
A land revenue settlement introduced by English East India Company. Thomas Munro and Alexander Read are associated with the implementation of Ryotwari Settlement in Madras. Major Wingate and Mr. Goldsmith are associated with the implementation of Ryotwari settlement in Bombay. Later this settlement was introduced in other parts of India such as Assam and Coorg of Karnataka.
The objective was to eliminate the intermediatory and establish the direct relationship between the government and the cultivator. Under the settlement the government acknowledge the peasants as the owners of the land. Revenue was to be calculated upon individual holding based on fertility of soil, the type of crop grown and other factors. The peasants was exempted from revenue payment in case of bad harvest or natural calamities. However, despite these regulations which were seldom, the high revenue demand often placed a significant leading to ineptness and economic distress which led to rise of new class of land lords call Mirasidare
Mahalwari Settlement
First implementation in Agra and later extended to the parts of United provinces, Punjab, The Gangetic plains and the parts of central India. It was introduced in 1822 by Holt Mackenzie and was later refined by Lord William Bentick in 1833. The other officials who are associated with this settlement are James Thompson and Merttins Bird. The objective was to create a more flexiable system of land revenue collection that could adapt local condition and agriculture productivity. The system were based upon collective responsibility of a village called Mahats. Revenue was estimated for the entire Mahats. It was subjected to periodic revision based upon agriculture productivity and market condition. The entire Mahat were collectively responsible for the paying the revenue.
However just like other land revenue settlement in India in the Mahalwadri Settlement the high revenue demand paced a significant financial burden on the peasants leading to indepthness and economic distress.
Commercialization of Agriculture
It is a process where in agriculture production is governed by the marked forces rather than the need for substances . In British India, this meant growing of the cash crops such as indigo, cotton, jute, opium, etc. The peasants were no longer producing for this own consumption but to fulfill the demands driven by colonial trade policies.
Causes of Commercialization of Agriculture
- The company and crown aim to integrate Indian economy into global capitalist system to serve the British economic interest. India was seen as the source of raw material for British industries and the market for the British manufactured goods.
- The British land revenue policies aimed in maximizing the land revenue collection which led to land tenure system that incentives cash crop cultivation.
- The British supported establishment of plantation particularly tea, coffee and rubber which led to large scale commercial farming.
- The expansion of railway network and construction of roads facilitated the movement of agriculture produce from the rural area to the ports and urban markets, enabling the farmers to sell their produce more easily. Similarly, the British investment in the irrigation projects such as canals supported the cultivation of water intensive cash crops.
- The commercialization process is also supported by the availability of credit from money lenders who provided the loan to the farmers for purchasing seed, fertilizers and other input required for the cash crop cultivation.
Consequences of Commercialization of Agriculture
- Farmer dependence on cash crops expose them to the marked flocculation and price volatility. Many times the poor peasants were force to sell their produce just after the harvest at whatever price they could get as they had to be on time the demands of government, the landlords and money lenders.
- The emphasis on cash crops produce under the area of food crop cultivation leading to food shortages and increased vulnerability to famines.
- Commercialization of agriculture led to exploitation of labor particularly on plantation where workers faced harsh condition, low wages and poor living conditions.
- Commercialization of agriculture facilitated the economic drain from India to Britain as the profits from the exports of the cash crops dedicated the British traders and industrialist more than the Indian parts.
Deindustrialization in India: Factors and Consequences
Deindustrialization in colonial India refers to the decline of traditional industries of India. Before the establishment of British colonialism India had a globally dominant highly advanced textile industry known for its fine cotton and silk textile. However in 19th century the Indian industries decline as a result of the following factors:-
- The British administration priorities the economic interest of Britain. The promotion of British manufacture goods and extraction of raw materials in India. The imposition of high import duties on Indian goods sent to Britain and low import duties upon the British goods sent to India made the Indian handicraft more expensive and less competitive in the domestic and international market.
- The industrial revolution led to the mass production of machine made goods. These goods were cheaper and have consistent quality compare to the handmade Indian products. The influx of the British machine made goods in Indian market led to decline of Indian handicrafts.
- The British focus on exporting raw materials like cotton and indigo from India to feed the British industries which disrupted the supply of raw materials for the local artisans, tradition Indian export market and other European market were lost due to the dominance of British manufacture goods and changing trade patterns.
- The development of railway and other forms of transportation facilitated the availability of British goods into remote areas of India further displacing the local handicrafts. Improve communication and management of the British trade network.
- The introduction of new land revenue settlement increase the financial burden on peasants artisans. They had to focus more on agriculture production to meet the revenue demand reducing the time and resources of artisans work.
Consequences
- The decline of traditional handicraft led to widespread unemployment among artisans and craftsman, who lost their primary source of income. Many displaced artisans fell into poverty and depth unable to sustain themselves without their traditional needs of their livelihood. The lost of traditional handicraft also led to the decline in artisanal skill and knowledge which are often passed down thorough generation.
- Many artisans were forced to migrate to urban areas in search of work leading to breakdown of traditional communities and societies. the economic distress caused by deindustrialization aggravated to social inequality and increase the vulnerability of the lower caste and marginalized communities who were often engaged in artisanal work.
- The traditional handicrafts were not just economic activity but also integral part of Indians cultural heritage. Their decline led to the lose of traditional artform, techniques and cultural expression. Many handicrafts were interested in specific festivals and rituals. Their decline affected the cultural fabric of the Indian society.
- The displacement of artisans led to an overrely on agriculture as the primary source of livelihood increasing pressure on land and agriculture resources. The increase dependance on agriculture contributed to agrarian distress as many former artisans were not skilled and struggles to make a living from agriculture.
Famine in British India
Famine is a widespread food scarcity caused by man made factor such as war, inflation, crop failure, population imbalance of the government policies. The ancient and medieval India did not enjoy absolute immunity from famine but what differ from the British rule as well as the proactive measures undertaken by the state.
Factors responsible for Famine in British India
- Commercialization of Agriculture.
- Economic drain and deindustrialization.
- The new land revenue settlement.
- Lack of adequate relief measures. The policies made by the British government were often reactive rather than proactive leading to delays in providing aid to the affected region. The measures were often inadequate and insufficient.
- Large amount of food grains were exported to meet the demands of British imperialism outside India leading to local shortage of food.
- The integration of the Indian agriculture with the global market made the local farms more vulnerable to international fluctuations.
- The Indian subcontinent were also affected by variations in rainfall which could led to period of drought and flood. Prior to the British rule the indigenous agriculture practices and local storage system have evolved to mitigate the impact of such variation. However during British rule the lack of infrastructure to manage these disasters aggravated their impact on food production and availability.
- The colonial period also witness significant population growth which put addition pressure on available resources.
- The entry of British into tribal areas and enactment of various forest act restricted the access of tribals to the forest produce and prohibited the Jhum cultivation leading to famines in the tribal areas.
Development of Railways in India and it's impact
The first train in India operated between the Red Hills to Chintadripet in Madras. It was called Red Hills railways. It was built by Arthur Cotton to transport granite stone for road construction. Lord Dalhousie prepare the overall development plan in his railway minute of 1853. In the same year first passenger train service between Boribandar in Mumbai to Thane.
On 1st August 1849, the Great Indian Peninsula Railway was in cooperated with a guarantee system of providing free land and guarantee of 5% rate of return to the private British companies building railways in India. These companies were to built and operate the railways under 99 year lease with the government having them option to buy them earlier.
Positive Impact of the Railways
It connected people from unknown areas and they could communicate with one other irrespective of caste and race which help in development of common consciousness among the Indians.
It help in the mobilization of Indian masses in general and leadership in particular during the nationalistic struggle. The railways were used by the nationalist leader to connect the masses from different parts of India.
The railways plays an important role in popularity the vernacular press. As a result the ideas of Indian leaders and their criticisms of the British policies could be read by the common mass. The railways also played a role in uniting the Indian economy. It significantly reduce the cost and time of transporting goods across the country which promoted the businesses like steel, coal mining and cement.
Railway made long distance travel easier and accessible which increase the mobility and facilitated large scale migration of the people for employment, religious pilgrims and social gatherings contributing towards a more interconnected and mobile society.
Railways were instrumental in the growth of cities. The new railway station became the center for urban development leading to emergent of new town and expansion of existing cities.
It is in the context of positive outcome of railway in India that the British journalist adverb or commented "Railways may do for India what dynasty never done, they may make India a nation".
Negative Impact of the Railways
The very of the British rule was colonial and therefore the introduction of the railways promoted economic exploitation of India to fulfill the interest of Britishers. Railways played a role in promoting a large scale drain of wealth from India to England.
The railways was used as a means to consolidate the British imperialism and colonialism upon India, enabling the rapid troop movement. It allowed the British a quick response for the uprising and also facilitated the centralization of governance.
Railways ruined Indian traditional handicrafts industry which became uncompetitive compare to British goods whom reached in the market increased due to railways.
The Drain of wealth
The drain of wealth refers to constant flow of wealth form India to England for which India did not get an adequate return. The theory was first highlighted by Dada Bhai Naroji in late 19th and early 20th century. He wrote about the drain in his work England debt to India, Poverty of India and Poverty and Un-British rule in India. Along with Naroji, RC Dutt in his work The Economic History of India highlighted the idea of drain. The theory was supported by VC Roy, GK Gokle, MG Ramade, G Subramania Iyer, Lala Lajpat Rai and Sakaram Ganesh Desuaka.
Sakram Ganesh was a close associate of Aurobindo Gosh. He published a book title Desher Katha in which he describe the British commercial and industrial exploitation of India and called the British rule upon India the result of hypnotic conquest of the mind.
Sir S. Subramania Iyer popularly known as Grand old man of South India also supported the theory along John Sullivan who said "Our system acts very much like a sponge, drawing up all the good things from the banks of Ganges and squeeze them down in the banks of Thames".
The major components of the drain of wealth are:
- Home charges i.e. the expenditure incurred in England by British government on behalf of expenses in India.
- The money transfer to British companies to gain their industrial and other form of infrastructure in India.
- Remittances to England by the Europeans living in India.
Socio-Cultural Impact of British upon India
The Orientalist phase (1772-1813)
The British socio-cultural policy during this phase was inspired by belief that to administer country. The knowledge of its culture and institution along with its past was needed. The idea was to learn about the Indian society without interfering with socio-economic practices.
The policy found expression during the time of Lord Warren Hastings(1772-85). He made efforts for acquiring the knowledge of indigenous institution and India's past so as to make India more familiar to British in general and to those associated with the task of administering India in particular. Under him the European scholars like Charles Wilkins, NB Halhed and Sir Wilkins Jones started research upon Indian History and culture. Wilkins translated Gita and Hitopadesha in English. Halhed published a text on Sanskrit grammar and prepared a detail account of religious and customary laws of India which he called the code of Gentoo Laws.
Warren Hastings founded the Calcutta Madarasa. Sir William Jones founded Asiatic society of Bengal in 1784. The society encourage study of India's ancient and medieval past. He translated Kalidasa's Manusmriti and Abhijanashakyntalam in English.
Lord Wellesely founded fort William College in Calcutta. The task of the college was to provide knowledge about the Indian language and tradition to British officials associated with task of administration of company officials in India.
Anglicist Phase
This phase witnessed the policy of careful intervention. The Background was due to impact of American revolution, French Revolution, Industrial Revolution influence of Christian missionaries and the influence of the ideologies like Humanism, Euangelicalism and Utilitarianism.
The major social reforms introduced under the influence of Anglicist Ideas are:-
- Bengal Regulation of 1795 and 1804 declared infanticide illegal and equivalent to murder.
- With the efforts of Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Lord William Bentick declared sati illegal by passing the regulation in his council in 1829.
- In 1830s, Bentick initiated operation against Thugi by appointing a special task force under the charge of Colonel William Sueman.
- The Charter Act of 1833 provided for abolition of slavery in India. It was finally abolished in 1843 when sati was declared illegal.
- Due to efforts of Pandit Ishwar Chandra Vidyasager, Lord Dalhousie formulated Hindu remarriage Widow Act, 1856. This act was passed during the time of Lord camming as Governor General of India.
- The Religious Disabilities Act 1850, also known as Caste Disabilities Removal Act allowed religious conversions while retaining the ancestral property rights.
- General Service Enlistment Act of 1856 provided that the new recruit in British army of Bengal should serve overseas if needed, ending the traditional exemption upon the foreign travel.
Post 1857 the phase of Indifference
1872 passing of the Native Marriage Act which legalized Inter-Case marriages, ban polygamy and fixed the age of marriage of girls at 14 years and boys at 18 years.
The Age of Consent Act 1892 raised the age of consent from 10 to 12 years for completing the conjugal rights. The Background of this act is associated with Dr. Rukma Bai Case.
Child Marriage Restrain Act of 1929 popularly known as Sarda act after the name of Rai Sahab Harbilas Sarda who advocated and supported this act in legislative assembly. The act fixed the age of marriage of girl at 14 and boys at 18 years.
British Education Policy
The period of British colonialism in India witness significant changes in education system that profoundly impact the Indian society.
The British introduced a structured education policy that aimed to serve their colonial interest while also responding to the demands of modern education from Indian elites. British education policy was shaped by various factors including economic motives, administrative needs, cultural beliefs and evolving socio-political context while the introduction of western education had some positive effects such as modernization and spread of scientific ideas and it also have several limitation and negative consequences.
Objectives of British Education Policy in India
- One of the primary objective was to create a class of India who were Indian in blood and color but English in taste, opinions, morals and intellect. The British needed Indians education to help them in administration of India by serving as clerks in bureaucracy.
- The British also aimed to create a pool of educated Indian who could contribute to colonial economy by promoting western education. The British hope to generate a new middle class that could support economic activities, trade and commerce.
- The British Education policy sought to promote western ideas and values and western cultural norms among the Indians. The introduction of English literature, science and philosophy aims to create a sense of intellectual and cultural superiority of the west over traditional Indian knowledge system. This cultural indoctrination was intended to legitimacies the British rule and foster loyalty to the colonial power.
- Missionaries were closely associated in the formation of British Educational policy. They played a significant role in establishing schools and colleges promoting education as a means of spreading Christian values and converting Indians into Christianity.
Implementation of British Education Policy
The introduction of English as a medium of instruction and western curriculum was formally introduced through Lord Macaulay's Minute on Education, 1853 and Bentick Resolution, 1835. This policy marked a significant shift from earlier efforts to promote oriental education and led to the decline of traditional educational institution. As a result the British establish English medium schools and colleges in major cities and towns across India.
The Wood's Dispatch of 1854 is often referred as the Magna Carta of the English education in India. It was more comprehensive effort for education in British India. It recommended the establishment of universities in Calcutta, Bombay and Madras. It emphasis the importance of higher education, teachers training and the promotion of technical and vocational education.
The Christian Missionaries played a critical role. They setup schools and colleges that offered English education and promoted Christian ideologies. The missionary intuitions such as St. Xavier, Bishop Cotton and other important centers of learning.
Indian reformist also contributed towards the development of education. Personalities like Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Ishwar Chand Vidyasagar and Dayanand Saraswathi supported the establishment of educational institutions that combines the western and traditional Indian knowledge.
Factors Responsible for the rise of Socio-Religious Reform Movement
The 19th century in India was a period marked by significant socio-religious reform movement, responding to complex interplay of factors that included colonial rule, exposure to western ideas, impact of modern education and a growing sense of anti-colonial conciseness. These movements were not merely religious in nature but were deeply connected with social custom and political reality of that time aiming to transform Indian society form.
One of the reasons for these movement was impact of British colonialism. The British Raj weakness the administrative and legal framework introduced new socio-economic challenges. The colonial policies created a new middle class educated in the western curriculum and familiar with the modern ideas. This new class became the promoter of reform using its awareness of the modern ideas for questioning the traditional practices and beliefs.
Another factor that played the role was the influence of modern education which expose the Indian to enlightenment ideas such a rationalism, humanism, liberty and equality. The personalities like Raja Ram Mohan Roy who founded Brahmo Samaj were deeply influenced by such ideas and sought to reconcile them with Indian tradition.
Another critical factor was the religious and philosophical influence of the west along with a critical reexamination of Indian scriptures.
Reformers like Swami Vivekanand who founded Ram Krishan Mission drew upon both Indian and western philosophical tradition to argue for more inclusive and spiritually fulfilling from the religion that transuded narrow ritualism and dogma. Similarly, the theosophical society with its merger of eastern and western mysticism also reflected this Synthes of idea and played a role in broader cultural and spiritual awakening.
The socio-economic religious reform movement were also a response to the internal challenges within the Indian society. The rigid caste system, untouchability, gender discrimination and superstitious practices were considered as incompatible with the modern ideas of equality and human dignity. Reforms sought to address these issues by advocating for social equality, challenging caste prejudice and promoting a more equalitarian vision of society. e.g. the movement like Satyashodhak Samaj led by Jyoti Rao Phule and Self Respect movement of BV Rama Swami Niakar also known as Periyar targeted caste discrimination and sought to uplift the marginalized. Similarly, Brahmo Samaj opposed idiolectally and denied the need for a priest class to interpret the religious text.
The rise of these movements were also caused by defensive nationalism in response to the western criticism of the Indian religion and culture. The derogatory portrayal of the Indian society by some British officials and missionaries provoked a sense of reassertion of Indian identity and heritage. In this context the reform movement are to perform and revive Hinduism and other religious from what seen as corrupt practices. Thereby defending the national culture against the colonial criticism.
Positive Outcomes of Socio-Cultural Reform Movements
- Abolition of Social evils:- One of the most notable achievement in the early phase was the abolition of the practice of Sati. The reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy opposed Sati calling him inhuman and contrary to the actual teachings of Hinduism. His efforts culminated the British government enactment of Bengal Sati Regulation 1829. Reform movement also targeted the practices of infanticide. Reformers like Ishwar Chand Vidya Sagar campaign for the rights for widows advocating of remarriage. His efforts led to the passing of Hindu Widow Remarriage act, 1856 which legally recognized the rights of Hindu widows to remarriage. The reformers also criticized child marriage by raising awareness and advocating for age restriction on marriage.
- Reform in religious practices:- Brahmo Samaj of Raja Ram Mohan Roy promoted the idea of monotheism, discarding idol worship and rejecting the caste based discrimination. He emphasized upon rationality, morality and the ethical teaching of Hindu scriptures. Similarly, Arya Samaj established by Dayanand Saraswathi called for "return to Vedas ". He opposed ritualism and superstitions. He advocated for the purification of Hinduism and emphasized upon universal values of truth, justice and social equality. The Singh Sabha movement in Punjab led to reform in Sikhism by promoting education, religious purity and social reform. The movement opposed superstitions among the Sikh by emphasizing upon the teaching of Guru Granth Sahib and the values of equality and community service. Similarly, the reform movement among the Muslim such as Aligarh movement of Sir Sayyad Ahmed Khan sought to modernize the Islamic education and reconcile the Islamic teaching with modern science and rationality.
- Revival of Indian Traditions:- The reform movement also sparked a cultural renaissance leading to the revival and reinterpretation of Indian traditions. The reformers sought to rediscover and promote the best aspects of the Indian culture and heritage. The reformist like Swami Vivekanand passed great respect for Indian philosophical system such as Vedanta.
- Promotion of Social equality and Justice:- Reformers like Jyoti Rao Phule, the founder of Satyashodhak Samaj openly criticized the caste system and its discriminatory practices. His efforts focused upon upliftment of the lower caste and eradication of untouchability. His advocacy for social equality challenged the traditional caste hierarchy and sought to promote dignity of all individuals. He was influenced by Thomas Paine work "The Rights of Man" and believe only solution to combat social evils was enlightenment of women and members of lower caste. His Book" Gulam Giri" is a critical account of the cast system and social discrimination that prevail in the 19th century. He taught his wife Savatri Bai how to read and write after which the couple opened the schools for girls in Pune. It is believed by many that is was Phule who first used the term Dalit for the depiction of the piled of oppressed masses among the Hindus. Vital Vidhvansak was a penury Marathi journal launched by a social reformer Gopal Baba Walangkar that served as first publication related to the untouchables aiming to raise awareness about their rights , challenges, caste oppression and promote self assertion. It marked a crucial movement where Dalit voices began using print media for self expression paving the way for the future anti cast movements. Social Respect Movement founded in 1925 by EV Rama Swami Nayakar also known as Periyar was an active social movement to establish a society devoid of caste based discrimination. The movement goal was to reject Brahminical supremacy of Hinduism. Many contemporary political parties such as DMK and AIADMK were established upon the tradition of Self Respect Movement. Similarly, Shiri Narayan Guru a social reformer from Kerala made significant contribution to the society in last 19th and early 20th Century. His work focused on promoting social equality, education and spiritual enlightenment challenging the prevailing caste system and advocating the rights of marginalized communities. The slogan of one religion one caste and one god for mankind is often associated with him. His disciple S Ayyapan changed it to no religion, no god, no caste for mankind. He supported the establishment of organization and movements that work towards social reforms. Shri Narayan Dharma Paripalana Yogam (SNDPY) established in 1903 by Dr. Padmanabha in one such association.
- Fostering National Consciousness and Unity:- The reform movements played a critical role in promoting a sense of national identity and unity by emphasizing upon common cultural and religious heritage these movement encourage Indian's to see them self as a part of larger national community going beyond the regional, caste and religious differences. The reformers promoted study of Indian history, language and cultural encouraging privy in India's ancient heritage. This cultural revivalism held to counter the sense of imperiality imposed by colonial rulers and lane the groundwork for emergence of Indian National Movement. In this context Dayananda Saraswathi was first reformer to use word 'Swaraj' for independence from foreign domination and establishment of Vedic self rule.
- Promotion of Women rights and education:- The reform movement emphasis upon the importance of education for women which was largely neglected in the traditional Indian society. These movement help to challenge the patriarchal norms that restricted the women's role and right in society by advocating for women education, rights to inheritance and abolition of discriminatory practices. These movements empower women to participate move actively in the social, cultural and political life. the women like Pandita Rama Bai and Sarla Devi became prominent voices advocating for women's rights and education.
These movements created a background for the establishment of organizations. Here are some examples:-
- Women's Indian Association founded in 1970 as the first feminist organization in India. Mrs. Annie Besant was appointed as its first president.
- National council of Women in India founded in 1925 as a branch of International council of women. It's first president was Maharani of Baroda.
- The all India women's conference founded in 1927 by Margret cousins is credited with creating the tune for Jan Gan Man in 1919 during Tagore's visit to Madanpalle, Andhra Pradesh. The organization played a critical role in the legislative reforms for women's such as Sardha Act, Devdai Act and The Hindu code Bill.
Limitations/Failure of Socio-Economic Reforms.
One of the primary limitation of these policies limited reach and impact of its upon the Indian society. Many of these reform movement were led by educated urban elite whose progressive ideas often failed to impact deeply the rural heartlands where majority of the Indian resides. The urban-rural divide meant that the transformative impact upon the society was uneven with many in the rural areas remaining largely untouched by the progressive ideas and changes advocated by reformers. The leaders of these movements were often the part of educated elite with sometimes led to disconnect between them and the masses. The reforms proposed by these leaders did not always connect positively with the masses or reach to the broader rural population. Many of the reforms required economic resources which were scares among the rural and the poor section of the society i.e. the lack of financial resources made it difficult for these communities to adopt and implement the proposed changes.
The masses are generally deeply attached to their cultural and religious traditions. In this context the changes were often seen as an attack on their identity leading to resistance and rejection. Moreover the reform movement often faced resistance form conservative elements within the society who were deeply vested in maintaining Quo. The Challenge from the personalities like Radha Kant the founder of Dharma Sabha made it difficult for the reformers to uphold and promote their ideas of reform against the traditional practices. Similarly, the association like Sanathan Dharma Rakshini Sabha was founded in 1873 its primary objective was to protect and promote the principles, values and traditions of Sanathan Dharma.
The nationalist leaders like Bal Ganga Dhar Tilak opposed the age of consent bill which was to raise the age of marriage for girls and boys. Similarly Pandit Madan Mohan Malivya although a nationalist and educationalist was sometimes seen as conservative specially regarding his stand on certain reforms proposed by the socio-economic reform movements.
Another significant limitation was internal division within the reform movement themselves in the form due to difference in ideologies, strategy and objectives which often led to division among them e.g. Baharm Samaj witness a split that led to the formation of Adhi Baharma Samaj of Devondera Nath Tagore and Baharm Samaj of Indian of Keshav Chandra Sain who later established Tabernacle of new dispensation also known as Naloa Bibban.
Similarly, in 1893 Arya Samaj got split into 2 factions i.e. the Gurukul factions led by Mahatma Munshi Ram (Swami Shardanand) who advocated for traditional Vedic education through the Gurukul System. In 1902 he established Gurkul Kangri in Haridawar. The second faction of Arya Samaj led Mahatma Hamraj established the first DAV school in Lahore. He is also known as the father of DAV movement.
Another major limitation of these reform movement was their emphasis on religious and philosophical aspects of cultural heritage which got sometimes magnifies. The Hindu reform confined their parse of Indian past for its ancient period and look upon the medieval period of the history as a period of decline and decay.
The Judicial Reform of Lord Warren Hastings
Lord Warren Hastings introduced a series of judicial administrations in 1772 alongside the system of revenue administration which went to laid on the foundation of Adalat system in Indian. Under this scheme the territory of Bengal was divided into multiple district and in each district an English or an British official of the the company who was responsible for the collection of revenue alongside having the judicial power. He established a hierarchy of court i.e.
- Small cause courts at the village or Pargana level to deal with the small or pity cases.
- Mofussil Diwani Adalat and Mofussil Nizamat or Faujdari Adalat.
- Sadar Diwani or Sadar Nizamat and Faujdari Adalat. In 1774, he introduced certain changes in the system of Adalat i.e.
- The collectors were replaced by Amils or Diwans who were appointed in each district. He was to act as revenue collector as well as judge of Mofussil Diwani Adalat.
- The territory of Bengal, Bihar and Odisha were divided into 6 divisions headquarters at Calcutta, Murshidabad, Burdwan, Dinajpur, Dacca and Patna.
- A provincial court of appeal was established in between the Sadar Diwani Adalat at the top and Mofussil Diwani Adalat below it.
Reforms of Lord Cornwallis
Lord Cornwallis was the Governor General of Bengal in 1786-93. He laid the groundwork for several administrative and Judicial reforms to improve the efficiency of administration and to ensure smooth governance of the vast territories under companies control.
He implemented the system of permanent settlement. He prohibited export of slaves from Bengal. He is regarded as the father of Indian civil services as he introduced Covenanted Civil Services also known as Imperial Civil Services. Lord Cornwallis also introduced police reforms. Under him the district were divided into police circles called Thanas. Each Thana were placed under Daroga. All the Thanas of a district were place under Superintendent of Police.
Lord Cornwallis implemented significant judicial reform. He was alarmed at the extend of power concentrated in the hands of district collector. He therefore separated the revenue collection and judicial function. He passed a regulation in 1793 under which the district collector were deprived of his judicial and magistrate power which are transfer to district judge.
He abolished the Faujdari Adalat and established circuit courts at Murshidabad, Dacca, Calcutta and Patna to handle the appeals in the civil and criminal cases. These courts were managed by the European judges who handle appeal in the civil and the criminal cases. He also established a clear grades of the civil courts at the lowest level were the Mofussil courts preside over by Indian officials who could decide the dispute involving amount of up to 50 Rupees. At the next level was the court of registrars led by European official who could handle the cases up to 200 Rupees. Appeal from these lower courts were directed to the district court presided over by district judge. Above these were provincial courts of appeal presided over by English judge. The highest appellate authority was the Sadr Diwani Adalat in Calcutta headed by Governor General of Bengal and his council.
Cornwallis made significant contribution in reforming criminal law in India. According to new rules under him in the case of murder the focus should be on the intention of the accused. Instead of traditional punishment like amputation of limbs or other body parts, Cornwallis replaced it with a system of temporary hard labor, fine or imprisonment depending upon the circumstances of the case. He passed a regulation in 1793 which amended the laws of evidence under this the will of the heir or kin of the deceased was no longer allowed to influence the punishment. Similarly, religious persuasions of witness should not affect the convection. His judicial reformed termed as Cornwallis Court.
Tribal Revolt
Causes of the Tribal Revolt
The tribal revolt in colonial India were significant expression of resistance and assertion by indigenous communities against the various forms of exploitation and expression they faced under the British rule.
The introduction of land revenue system of British disrupted traditional land ownership pattern. The tribal land were brought under these system leading to confiscation of their land by the outside which led to widespread displacement of the tribal communities.
The British implemented several forest acts restricting the tribal control over the forest which were the primary source of their livelihood. These act prohibited the traditional tribal practices such as shifting cultivation, hunting and food gathering. The British emphasis upon commercial forestry such as cutting of tress for railways and other industries further deprived the tribal people of their traditional resources of food and their income.
The tribal were often forced into bonded labour on plantation, mines and construction projects under harsh conditions. This exploitation was further aggravated by the colonial demand for cheap labour. The money lenders exploited tribal communities through high interest loans leading to perpetual depth bondage.
The British policies and missionary activities often aim to civilize tribal imposed aerial social norms and disrupted their traditional lifestyle. This included the introduction of formal education system that disregarded the tribal knowledge and practices. With Christian missionaries converted tribal population leading to cultural and religious conflict within the communities.
Tribal were marginalized and categorized as primitive and backward by the colonial authorities and the mainstream societies. This created a lose of identity and undermine their social autonomy.
The British imposed direct control over tribal region through the establishment of agency and districts often disregarding the traditional leadership and governance structure of tribals.
The Nature and Character of Tribal Revolt
The tribal revolts in India during British colonial rule represent a significant chapter in the border history in the the Indian freedom struggle. Unlike the main stream nationalist movement which was predominately urban and more ideologically in character, the tribal revolts were largely localised, violent and spontaneous. The tribal uprising were certain outburst of violence often targeting symbols of authority such as police station, revenue offices, the house of land lords and money lenders. They used traditional weapons and methods such as Guerrilla warfare.
One important aspect of the tribal revolt was their millenarian character i.e. their believe in divine justice and return to the ancestral order often led by charismatic leaders e.g. the leaders like Birsa Munda or Sidhu and Kanbu combine spiritual authority with political leadership.
The tribal revolt were not coordinated as one united action. They lack a pan India vision unlike the contemporary struggle, the tribal revolt often witness active participation of women.
Achievements of Tribal Revolt
One of the significant achievement was the revival and strengthen of the tribal identity. These movements foster a sense of pride among the tribal communities in their cultural heritage and tradition.
After a series of uprises, the British made a compromise by recognizing the traditional governance system of tribal and by integrating them into the system of colonial administration. e.g. The Santhal Rebellion of 1855-56 led to the implementation of Santhal Pargana Tenancy Act, 1876 which provided some protection to the Santhal land and recognized their customary land rights.
Some tribal revolt also led to reduction of exploitation practices of money lenders and land lords. The British administration was forced to take measures to cure the exploitation of tribal by the landlords. Although these measures were often limited and not uniformly implemented.
Some tribal movement emphasized upon social reform within the tribal communities such as promoting education, cleanliness, teetotalism and moral living. These reforms improve the social condition of the tribals.
The tribal uprises and sprit of resistance they displayed inspired many leaders and freedom fighter in the India's freedom struggle. The courage and determination displayed by the tribal communities became a source of inspiration for struggle against colonial rule. The legacy of the tribal movement played a crucial role in shaping post independence policies aimed at recognizing and protecting tribal rights. The Indian constitution provided for special protection for schedule tribes acknowledging their unique socio-economic challenges.
The Civil Rebellion: Causes and Consequences
The civil rebellion in India during the 18th and 19th century represents one of the earliest and most widespread form of the earliest and most widespread form of resistance against the colonial oppression before the beginning of an organized nationalist movement. These rebellions which was witness in various parts of India involved deposed ruler, the local chieftains, peasants, artisans, religious leaders who collectively challenge the British colonial rule and its Indian collaborators.
Though diverse in origin and scale these uprising share a common character of spontaneity, localism and militancy and they reflected the deep discontent and dissatisfaction caused by the economic, political and social transformation introduced under the British rule.
The rise of civil rebellion was primarily triggered by the breakdown of traditional power structure during the extension of British rule in India. The companies conquest of India between the mid 18th and early 19th century involve
- The displacement of former ruling classes like Mughals, Marathas, Nawabs and Rajput.
- The undermine of the old class of Zamindar and local elites who were replaced by a new class of revenue collectors supporting the colonial state.
- The introduction of new land revenue system like permanent Rehatwari, Mahalwadi led to widespread agrarian distress.
- Commercialization of agriculture, exploitation of money lenders and loss of livelihood by artisans due to the influx of British manufacture goods.
- Religious and cultural factors such as missionary activities, abolition of sati and changes in traditional practices which alarm a large section of Indian society.
Consequences
Despite their serious challenge to the British rule the civil rebellion were supressed by the use of superior military force of the British. However, they had important consequences:-
- They exposed the discontent and dissatisfaction against colonial administration specially in rural and semi urban part of India.
- They forced the British to restructure the revenue policy adopt conciliatory strategy and sometimes restore the traditional rights to them.
- The laid the foundation of the future uprises such as 1857 revolt.
- They served as an early expression of resistance and became a symbol of pride and folk memory, later received during the nationalist struggle.
The Peasant Uprises: Causes and Consequences
The peasants uprises in the period of British colonialism was the outcome of the British colonial policies in India during the period of 18th and 19th century. It was the result of deep economic exploitation, social oppression and administrative injustice. The uprises such as indigo revolt, deccan riots and Moplha rebellion reflected the growing distress of the rural population under the colonial policy.
One of most important cause was the exploitative land revenue system introduced by British. Another major cause commercialization of agriculture. Along with these, the role of money lenders and other intermediaries further worsened the situation for the peasants.
Peasants also suffer due to the the loss of traditional rights. Earlier village communities had some control over the land and resources, but the British policies abolished these systems. The forest laws of the British restricted access to forest affecting the livelihood of the peasants. The frequent famines and economic crisis aggravated the misery. Despite food shortages the British continued revenue collection and exports of grains. This showed indifference of colonial administration towards the peasants welfare.
Social and culture factors also played along. In some regions the peasants revolted against the foreign rule and the local oppression together, combing the economic grievances with sense of resistance against British authority.
Outcomes
The peasants uprises highlighted the serve economic exploitation faced by the peasants under the British rule. These uprises often forced the British government to reconsider and in some cases reform their policies to address the grievances of the peasants.
The methods and strategies employed in these uprises served as model for future struggles. They demonstrated the power of collective action and the effectiveness of local leadership.
These uprises developed a sense of unity and shared identity among different regions and communities. Over the period of time they also contributed towards the development of broader national consequences.
The persistent and courageous resistance of the peasants against over welling odds established a tradition of defiance against the colonial rule. The sacrifice made by the peasants in these uprises became a powerful symbol of resistance and martyrdom, motivating others to join the fight against colonial oppression.
The lessons learnt from peasants uprises created the condition for the post independence agrarian reform such as abolition of Zamindari, ceiling on the land holdings and the Bhoo Dan and Gram Dan movement of Acharya Vinoba Bhave. These reforms ended the power of the traditional landlord and the money lenders class resulting in the transformation agrarian structure.
Revolt of 1857
Nature and Character of Revolt of 1857
The revolt was a reaction of the rapid and often insensitive imposition of British rule which affected many sections of the Indian society. The nature of the uprising was inherently diverse as it brought together the different section of the society including peasant, soldiers, landlords and nobility, each with their grievances against the company's policies. This coalition was united in their opposition to British rule but varies in their objectives and aspirations making the revolt a widespread resistance against colonial oppression.
The character of revolt was both political and economic. Politically, it represented an attempt to restore olde order where personalities such as Bahadur Shah Zafar were seen as a symbols of authorities and legitimacy. The revolt was not just a military rebellion but also a manifestation of desire to reclaim the autonomy over Indian affairs which had been systematically eroded by the British policies.
The annexation of states under the doctrine of lapse, the disrespect shown to the traditional ruler and direct control over the large part of Indian territory by British which was seen as a direct threat to existing political order.
Economically the revolt was fuelled by widespread discontent among the common masses especially peasantry due to the British policies in agriculture and trade. Moreover, the British social reforms was also considered by masses as an attack upon Indian culture and tradition.
Military aspect of revolt was significant as it was initially triggered by the sepoys in the British army and the immediate cause was Greased cartridge.
The 1857 uprising was not an isolated incident but a culmination of series of local and the regional rebellions that were witnessed across India during the period before the revolt.
Calling the revolt of 1857 as a nationalist uprising and the first war of independence is a matter of historical interpretation with different opinion among the historian and scholars. The revolt which began as a mutiny eventually got the support from various segments of Indian society including the peasants, landlords and deposed rulers. It spread across northern and central India and it gave tough challenge to British force. However, it fail to evolve into a unify national movement with common goal of achieving independence form British rule. To understand whether it termed as nationalist uprising and first war of independence one needs to examine the nature, scope and objectives behind the revolt.
The Rise and Growth of Nationalism in India
The rise and growth of nationalism in India during British colonialism was driven by combination of social, economical, political and cultural factors. These factors collectively develop a sense of national identity and unity among the diverse Indian population leading to the emergence of a strong nationalist movement aimed at securing the independence from the British rule.
When the British introduced western education in India, they aim at creating a class of educated Indians who could serve the British interest, promoted the ideas of modern government and administration. The English language help the nationalist leaders from the different linguistic backgrounds to communicate with each other and create a sense of national identity. The modern western education promoted the ideas of democracy, freedom and nationalism.
The social reform movement led by Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Swami Vivekanand and Ishwar Chand Vidyasagar promoted the idea of social equality, justice and modernity which created a new nationalist agenda. The reform movement promoted a sense of pride in Indian culture and heritage. The revival of Indian language, literature and art under the leader like Rabindra Nath Tagore and Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay develop a sense of culture renaissance the reenforce national pride and identity.
The second half of 19th century saw the rise of nationalist press in India. It criticized the British policies and brought together people from different backgrounds by spreading awareness. The rise of nationalist press with newspaper like Amrita Bazar Patrika, Maratha Kesari, etc. played an important role in spreading the nationalist idea and mobilizing public opinion against the British rule.
The success of nationalist movement in other parts of world such as American Revolution, French Revolution, The Italian and German unification inspired the Indian nationalist and provided them with the strategies and hope for their own struggle.
The political unification of the country necessities by the connivence of administration had two fold effect i.e. the economic faith of the people of different regions got linked together and the people living different parts of the country start looking towards each other as one.
The broader means of transport and communication such as railways brought people together specially the leaders from different regions. Together this was important for exchange of political ideas and for the mobilization and organization of the public opinion on political and economic issues.
British administrative and economic policies gave rise to a new urban middle class in the town and cities. This class prominent because of education, new position and it close link with the British officials came to the fore front. The leadership to the Indian National Congress in all its stages of growth was provided by this class.
The racial myth of white superiority were sought to be perpetuated by the British through a deliberate policy of discrimination and segregation. Indian felt deeply hurt by this. e.g. the reactionary policies of Lord Lytton made it clear to the nationalist that justice and fair play could not be expected where the interest of European community involved.
The historical researchers by the European and Indian scholars created a entirely new picture of India's past. The theories put forward by European scholars such as Alexander Kalin Gum, Alexander Rea, Albert Henry, etc. emphasized that the Indo-Aryans belong to the same ethnic group from which the people of other European nation belong. The self respect and confidence gain by this nationalist to demolish the colonial myth that India had a long history of sub-ordination to the foreign rulers.
Formation of Indian National Congress: Factors Responsible
The formation of congress in 1885 was a significant movement in history of India's freedom struggle. It marked the beginning of an organized political activism in India and laid the foundation for the subsequent struggle against the British colonial rule. It's formation was influence by a combination of factors including the rise in political conciseness among the Indian, the socio-economic changes under the British rule, the role of British administration and the efforts of Indian and British intellectuals.
The spread of western education during the British rule played a crucial role in the emergence of new class of educated Indians. This group was familiarizes with European political ideas like democracy, liberty and freedom which shape their understanding of governance and colonialism. The educated Indian began to realize the discriminatory and exploitative nature of British rule and they wanted the political reform to address their grievances.
The British economic policies had a devasting impact upon Indian agriculture, industry and crafts which caused discontent among educated middle class who recognized the need for political representation to express their grievances.
The beginning of railways, telegraph and modern postal system by British help to improve communication among the different parts of India allowing the Indians to exchange their ideas and come together, creating a sense of unity and national conciseness.
Several early political organization laid the groundwork for the formation of congress these included the British Indian Association (1851), Poona Sarvajanik Sabha (1870) and The Indian Association (1876). Indian National Congress represented an effort to unite these organization and provided a national platform for political discussion and debate.
A crucial factor in the formation of INC was the events of the time of Lord Litton and Lord Rippon as the viceroy of India during the period 1876-1880 and 1880-1884 respectively. One popular historical explanation for the formation of INC is the theory of Safety Wall. According to this theory, the British government concern about the growing discontent and nationalist sentiment in India, established INC as a safety wall to channelize the Indian grievances in a peaceful and control manner. According to this view, Aoum acted as an agent of British government, facilitating the creation of INC to serve as a safety wall. However, there are limited evidences to suggest that British government planned the formation of INC as a safety wall while, Aoum involvement is well established calling his action British conspiracy is not proved by concrete evidence. Aoum action were based upon his genuine concern for the Indian welfare and his belief in the liberal political principle reducing his role that of British agent over simplified his contribution.
INC's formation was driven by the genuine aspiration of the educated Indians for political representation, social reform and economic justice. It reflected the growing political conciseness and organizational abilities of the Indian middle class Intelligenzia.
The Moderate Ideology Program and Methods
The moderates belief in constitutional methods and wanted to achieve their goal through legal and peaceful means. They sent petition to British parliament and use press to raise their demand. They engage in dialogue and diplomacy with the British officials believing that they could bring about gradual change through precaution and negotiations.
The moderate organize meetings and conference to mobilize public opinion and get support for their causes. These gathering help to spread nationalist ideas and develop a sense of collective identity. They utilize the press effectively to spread their views criticized colonial policies and educated the masses about their rights and responsibilities. Moderate supported the spread of modern idea of government and modern education they believed that education was the key to empower Indians and prepare them for demanding for better form of government. They emphasis the need for enlightenment and rational thinking and they encourage the Indians to adopt the modern values and practices.
The moderates showed believed in the British sense of justice. They showed allegiance to Britishers and also faith in their mission regarding the upliftment of Indians. They believed that Britishers could be persecuted for reforms for India. The basic task of moderate was to formulate demand present in to the government and put pressure upon the government to acknowledge them by convincing the government about the fairness of the demand.
Congress under moderates laid great emphasis upon the propaganda upon Indian grievances in England. The moderate leaders highlighted the Indian demand in England e.g. Dada Bhai Naroji had spent a significant time of his active political life in popularizing India's case in England. In 1889, congress formed a separate committee in London to raise awareness about the Indian issue in Britain, influence the British public opinion, present the Indian perspective in Britain and counter misinformation about Indian governance. The first chairperson of committee was William Wedderburn and first secretary was William Digby. This committee started publishing information about to shape the British understanding of Indian problems.
The Extremist Ideology Program and Methods
The extremist showed no belief in British sense of justice and generosity, they adapted extra constitutional means and methods. The extremist leaders did not use violence but they took a sympathetic view of the activities of revolutionaries.
They emphasized upon mass organization and showed faith in strength and power of the masses. They planned to achieve Swaraj through mass action. They used the methods of mass demonstration, protestation and agitation. They placed emphasis upon accusive aggression of rights and fighting for rights.
They called for boycott of the British goods, institution and services. This included avoiding British clothes, schools courts and other services. They promoted the establishment of national schools and colleges to provide education free from colonial influence. They also encourage people to settle dispute through indigenous arbitration instead of relying upon British courts.
The extremist emphasized upon Swaraj which meant complete independence from British rule.
They rejected idea of gradual reform and demanded immediate and completely independence. While largely non-violent extremist advocated for active resistance against British policies. They extensively use newspaper and journals to spread nationalist ideas and criticized colonial policies. The leaders like Tilak use publication such as Kesari and Maratha to reach a wider audience.
The extremist sought to receive and promote Indian culture, tradition and religious practices. They believe that strong sense of homogeneity in culture is essential to build up a strong national identity e.g. Tilak popularize the celebration of Ganesh festival (1893) and Shivaji festival (1894) to unite people and develop in depth sense of pride and cultural unity. These festival become occasions for public meeting and nationalist speeches.
There was a fundamental change in the nature of Indian nationalism under extremist leadership due to their forceful articulation for the demand of Swaraj and use of more radical methods than those of the moderate. In this context they aroused a sense of cultural nationalism identity shaped by cultural tradition but not on the concept of common ancestry or race.
The Partition of Bengal
The partition of Bengal in 1905 by Lord Curzon was a significant event in the history of British India making a turning point in the nationalist movement against the British rule. The official reason given for partition was to improve administrative efficiency in the vast of which at that time included Bihar and parts of Odisha. Bengal was the largest and most popularize province in British India, the British however claim that its size and administrative complexities made it difficult to govern effectively.
Partition had a deep political motive and for reaching consequences sparking widespread nationalist agitation that had a profound impact on India's struggle for independence. The partition was intended to weaken the nationalist movement in Bengal. By dividing the region into a predominately Muslim eastern half and predominately Hindu western half. Curzon hope to arouse communal sentiment thereby diluting the nationalist challenge to British.
The announcement of partition by Curzon led to an intense opposition form the people of Bengal. The swadeshi movement which advocated for boycott of British goods and promotion of Indian made goods was formally launched of 7th August 1905.
The day of partition i.e. 16th October 1905 was observed in Bengal as the day of Mourning Shok Diwas and Raksha Bandhan Day on the suggestion of Rabindra Nath Tagore. Similarly, RS Trivedi called for the observants of Arandhan i.e. not cooking food at home. The movement gave tremendous impetuous to the Indian industry. Bengal Chemical factory was established by VC Roy Swadeshi Steam Navigation company was started by V Chidambaram Pillai. Tata Iron and Stell company was founded in 1907 by Jamshed Ji Tata. Significant revival was witness in handloom, slick weaving and many other traditional handicrafts.
The nationalist formulated a program for promoting the national education. In this context the National Council of Education was founded by Satish Chandra Mukherji, Bengal National College was established by Aurobindo Gosh and University of Calcutta wad declared as Gulam Khanna by the Indian students protesting in Swadeshi Movement.
The Swadeshi Movement also witness the rise of nationalist aspiration in the form of songs like Vande Matram and Amar Sonar Bangla. Abanindranath Tagore who painted Bharat Mata in 1905 on the basis of the concept popularize by Bankim Chandra Chatterjee in his book Anand Mat.
The Surat Split: Causes and Consequences
At the heart of the split was the ideological difference between the moderates and extremist within the congress. The partition of Bengal by Lord Curzon and the Swadeshi Movement that followed further intensified the divide between the two groups. Moderates wanted limited protest but extremist wanted an aggressive mass movement. This further got aggravated with the issue like conflict over leadership and the definition of Swaraj. Finally the disagreement over the choice of president in Surat led to physical clash and split.
The immediate consequence of the split was the weaking of the congress as a party and a united political force. Within the party it's ability to give an effective challenge to the British rule was significantly weaken.
The split led to discontent among the youth at some section of the population within the congress was discontented which led to the rise of revolutionary groups in Bengal, Maharashtra, Punjab and other parts of India which sought to achieve independence through arms struggle and acts of violence against British officials.
Revolutionary Nationalism
The rise and growth of revolutionary nationalism in British India was inspired by a combination of political, social and economic factors. These movements which emerged in late 19th and early 20th century represented a method of petition and negotiations advocated by early nationalist. The movement drew inspiration from a mixed of a indigenous traditions and global revolutionary ideas.
The immediate political cause of revolutionary nationalism can be traced backed to the dissatisfaction with the slow paced of reforms. The partition of Bengal by Lord Curzon was a significant turning point that sparked the widespread anger and protest across the country. The division of Bengal was seen as an attempt to divide and rule by splitting the Hindu and Muslim population which led to the questions upon effectiveness of constitutional and peaceful protest and seek a more direct form of action against British rule.
The social and cultural forces of the time also contributed towards the rise of revolutionary movement. The late 19th and early 20th centuries witness a resurgence of cultural nationalism coupled with a revival of marital tradition in regions like Punjab, Bengal, Maharashtra. This revival was partly a response to the British cultural imperialism and derogatorily depiction of Indian civilization as passive.
Economic grievances also played a crucial role in promoting revolutionary sentiment among Indians. The exploitative economic policies of the British which priorities British industrial interest led to widespread unemployment and poverty.
The spread of western education and ideas among the Indian middle class exposed young Indian to the revolutionary and the democratic ideals. The writing of Italian revolutionary Mazzini, the Irish nationalist and the success of the Russian Revolution provided inspiration and a model for political action.
The ideology and Program of Revolutionaries
The ideology of the revolutionary struggle in British India was rooted in a profound sense of nationalist and urgent call for action against colonial rule. A crucial aspect of their ideology was the emphasis on sacrifice and martyrdom for the nation's cause. The revolutionaries sought to awaken a sense of patriotism amongst the Indians through their deeps and sacrifices hoping to inspire others to join struggle for freedom.
The revolutionary struggle was a response from the side of nationalist youth challenging colonialism. It emerged as an alternative form of struggle i.e. an alternative for moderates constitutional agitation and extremist passive resistance.
The fundamental element of revolutionary ideology was the path of violence to create fear among the British. They wanted to initiate an armed struggle against the British rule in India. Their program were manifested in the form of assassination of unpopular British officials and organizing Swadeshi dacoities to raise funds.
The revolutionaries kept heroism and the spirit of self sacrifice at a very higher level of patriotism. In this context they used rhetorical songs and slogans during the struggle e.g. the famous slogan "Inquilab Zindabad" coined by Hasrat Mohani inspired activities of revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh.
The revolutionaries focused on building up secret societies to carry out their activities. These societies played a significant role in providing the training and planning of revolutionary acitivites.
Another important medium of revolutionary activities was newspaper and journals which they used as chief medium for the spread of revolutionary thought and to aroused anti-imperialistic sentiment.
While primarily focused on political independence, some revolutionary groups also recognized the importance of social and educational reform as a part of their struggle. In this context they wanted to eradicate the social evils, promote education among the masses and develop a sense of unity and national conciseness beyond an individual belief about his religion and caste.
The Home Rule Movement: The Background
The Home Rule Movement in India launched in 1916 was a significant milestone in the countries struggle against British colonialism. This movement aim at achieving self governance within the British empire by all constitutional means. The cause of the movement was multifaceted and compassing political, social and international factors.
The immediate political cause of the movement was the dissatisfaction of the Indian with British government. This prompted the leader like Tilak and Mrs. Annie Beasant to advocate Home Rule as a means to achieve self governance and greater autonomy.
The international context of early 20th century particularly the I world War had a significant impact on the Home Rule Movement. The war exposed the threats of European colonialism. It cost immense loss to the Indians. It inspire the Indian masses and leaders to raise the demands for freedom.
Tilak's return to the active politics after 6 years of imprisonment and his alliance with Mrs. Annie Beasant provided a significant ground for the launched of movement. Their effort to mobilize public opinion through newspaper, pamphlets and public meetings was crucial in spreading Home Rule message across India. It was during the movement that Tilak got the Lokmanya and he said "Swaraj is my birth right and I shall have it".
Non-Cooperation Movement: Causes and Consequences
The non-cooperation movement was launched under the leadership of Gandhi in 1920 as a non-violence protest against the British rule in India, making it pivotal movement in India's struggle for independence. This movement was India's response to Rawllet Act, Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, Khilafat issue and the act of 1919 that led to widespread dissatisfaction with the British government.
Gandhi proposed non-cooperation as a method of achieving Swaraj within a year if it was executed perfectly. The strategy was to withdraw Indian participation from British schools, courts and businesses and boycott the British made goods. Gandhi believed that if the Indians refused to cooperate with the British made goods. Gandhi believed that if the Indians refused to cooperate with the British, the colonial administration would be force to reorganize India's demand due to economic impact and the undermining of it's authority.
The movement was also a reflection of Gandhi's philosophy of Satyagraha which advocated non-violence resistance as a means to bring social and political changes. Gandhi argued that true independence would come only through Satyagraha.
The significance of the non-cooperation movement lies not just in political mobilization it achieved but also in the profound impact it have upon the socio-economic condition of time. During the non-cooperation movement nationalist educational institution like Jania Milla Islamia, Kashi Vidyapeeth, Gujrat Vidyapeeth and Bihar Vidyapeeth were established to promote self reliance and education free from the British control.
One of the most significant impact of movement was its mass appeal, it manage to unite diverse section of Indian society under common cause. For the first time a strong Hindu-Muslim unity was witness in the nationalist struggle. This unity highlighted the potential of the pan Indian nationalist struggle and the collective power of the Indian masses against the British Raj.
The movement also had a significant economic implication emphasis of Swadeshi and boycott of the British goods boosted the Indian industries and handicrafts fostering economic self reliance and reducing dependency on imported goods. This period witness the revival of indigenous crafts, textile and other traditional industries laid the foundation for economic nationalism.
The Swarajists Struggle: Causes, Ideology and Consequences
The Swaraj party was founded in 1923 as a result of changing circumstances within Indian national movement. It rise is closely associated to the debate over strategy after the suspension of non-cooperation movement. The abrupt suspension of movement led to the emerge of two groups within the congress i.e. No-Changers, who wanted to continue constructive work and Pro-Changers who supported the program of council entry. The party was formally established with the name Congress Khalifat Swaraj Party on 1st Jan 1923 by Motilal Nehru and Siyadas. The primary objective of party was attainment of Swaraj i.e. self rule for India within the British empire.
The party sought to use the legislative council as a platform for the constructive opposition to British colonialism. They aim to exposed the limitation and exploitative nature of the British policies through debates and legislative obstruction.
The most distinctive aspect of the Swaraj party program was it's decision to contest election for the legislative council. Once elected the members of party would adopt the policy of responsive cooperation, which means that they would cooperate with the government of if it was responsive to their demands otherwise they would obstruct it's functioning to force the reforms.
One of the most immediate achievement of Swaraj party was it's success in 1923 election to the central legislative assembly and various provincial legislative council. In central assembly they secured 42/141 elected seats while in the provincial assembly of Bengal, central provinces, Bombay and Union Province they perform well. The electoral success demonstrated significant public support for their approach and provided them with a platform to challenge the British policies from within the legislative framework.
The entry of the Swaraj party into the legislative council transformed the political dynamics of the council. In the central legislative the Swarajists force the appointment of a committee to enquire into the defects of the act of 1919 and to suggest remedies. The committee was formed under Sir Alexander Muddiman with 4 Indian members i.e. Sir Sivaswami Aiyer, Dr. RP Pranjpaye, Sir Tej Bhadhur Sobru and Md. Ali Zina.
The Swaraj parties legislative activism also had a significant impact on the discourse surrounding the key national issue. They used their position in the council to advocate reforms such as reduction in land revenue, tax relief for the Indians and the policies supporting Indian industries and agriculture.
The working of the Swaraj party was so efficient that Gandhi after his release from the prison on 5th Feb 1924 supported the struggle of the party. In congress session at Ahmedabad in June 1924, Gandhi proposed:
- Making spinning a minimum qualification for congress membership
- Condoning revolutionary activities in Bengal. The first proposal was rejected but second was passed. In March 1925, the Swarajist succeeded in electing Vital Bhai Patel as the president of the central legislative council. In the same year Motilal Nehru accepted the membership of Skeen Committee form under the chairmanship of Andrew Skeen to report upon the Indianization of the army.
Rise of Socialism in Indian National Movement and it's Impact
The rise of socialist and communist trends within the Indian National Movement in 1920s and 30s can be attributed to several internal and external factors. This period was marked by deepening of political consensus and broadening of the struggle against British colonial rule influenced by global event such as Russian revolution and evolving socio-economic condition within India.
One of the primary cause of rise of these was the stark of socio-economic disparities prevailing in the Indian society. The colonial economic policies had caused poverty, landlessness and unemployment creating and fertile ground for ideologies that promised social and economic equalities. Similarly the urban working class faced poor working condition, low wages and job insecurity. The socialist and communist ideologies with their emphasis on the right of the peasants and the workers, redistribution of wealth and end of exploitative practices resonated with discontented section of the society.
The impact of these ideologies on the Indian National Movement was significant shaping its ideology and strategy during the crucial years leading up to India independence. The rise of the leftist ideologies infused the freedom struggle with the focus on social justice economic equality and the right of the working class and peasantry. The introduction of these ideas added a new dimension to the movement and provided an alternative vision for the post colonial India. This influence was evident through the emergence of various socialist and communist group and integration of leftist principle into the broader nationalist agenda.
The Indian National Congress witness the rise of the socialist cause particularly with the rise of Congress Socialist Party 1934 with the leaders like Jai Parkash Narayan, Ram Monaohar Lohia and Narendra Dev. The influence of socialist and communist principle led to significant ideological shift with the national movement. This ideological shift was witness in the Karachi resolution of 1931, Faizpur Session of Congress 1936, formation of All Indian Kishan Sabha 1936 and National Planning Committee 1938.
In the Karachi session congress passed the resolution for the fundamental rights including the rights such as minimum wages, right to form union and state ownership of key industries. Similarly in the Faizpur Session congress passed the resolution of agrarian program like reduction of revenue, abolition of forced labour and recognition to the peasants union.
Civil Disobedience Movement
The Civil Disobedience Movement by Gandhi in 1930 was a significant milestone in the India's freedom struggle marking a decisive shift towards mass civil resistance against the British colonial rule. The movement which began with the historic Dandi March was a result of a series of political, economic and other development that took place during the years before 1930s.
The appointment of the Simon Commission in 1927 aroused the nationalist sentiment among the Indians. In response to the Simon Commission, the INC held it's annual session in Madras in 1927 where it passed resolution calling for the boycott of the commission. The congress proposed a Nehru report 1928 outlying the demand for the dominion status for India within the British empire. However, the British government did not accept the Nehru report further deepening the crisis between the colonial administration and Indian leaders.
The failure of the British government to respond positively to the Indian demands for constitutional reforms led to decisive shift in the approach of the INC. Finally, at the Lahore session in 1929 presided over by Jhawar Lal Nehru congress adopted a resolution declaring Purn Swaraj as its official goal. The session empowered Gandhi to launch a mass civil disobedience for achieving the goal. Gandhi launched the movement by breaking the Salt Law on 6th April 1930 at Dandi (Gujrat).
The Civil Disobedience Movement of congress was the second great mass movement after Non-cooperation Movement under the Gandhian leadership. The movement made a wider impact on the people's mind and caused larger nationalist awakening and the spread of greater nationalist sentiment and ideas. The movement led to the widening struggle. It led to politicizations of various groups. Gandhi's statement "Sedition has become my religion" made during the launch of the movement reflected his view to defy the unjust British laws which were often level by British as sedition.
Another major political significance of the movement was its manifestation in different forms in different part of the country. In this context one popular manifestation of Civil Disobedience Movement was Khudai Khidmatgar struggle of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Frontier Gandhi) in north-west frontier province. Another important manifestation was anti chowkidari tax campaign in Bihar and Bengal.
The movement was eventually suspended in 1933 and officially withdrawn in 1934. Finally it represented a crucial phase for the freedom struggle and created the larger background for the Government of India Act, 1935.
Quit India Movement
The failure of the Cripps Mission and the fear of Japanese invasion in India led Gandhi to began his campaign for British to quit India. Gandhi believed that presence of British in India is an invitation of Japan to invade India and their withdrawal would remove that threat.
On 14th July 1942 in making of Congress working committee at Wardha, Gandhi drafted Quit India Resolution on 7th August 1942 the session of Congress started in Bombay. The next day on 8th August 1942 the congress ratified the Wardha Resolution with sanctioned non-violent mass struggle under leadership of Gandhi. This historic meeting took place at Gowalia Tank Maidan in Bombay which is officially renamed as August Kranti Maidan.
The meeting ended around midnight on 8th August 1942. In the early hours of 9th August police arrested Gandhi, Abul Kalam Azad and others eminent congress leaders like Nehru and Patel within a week the members of entire congress were arrested. The news of arrest of leaders shock the people and they come on street protesting it. The movement thereafter become directionless and leaderless.
The movement is often regarded as the final battle for independence of India as it mobilize millions of Indians to participate in struggle against colonial rule. The movement was characterized by its clear demand to British to leave India immediately. The slogan quit India captured the essence of movement emphasizing that India would no longer tolerate the British rule.
The movement witnessed precented mass participation across India. Indians including students, farmers and women's and even school going children's join the struggle.
Viceroy Lord Linlithgow described it as by far the most rebellion after 1857. Subhas Bose described it Guarilia war.
While Gandhi's movement were non-violent in nature, the Quit India marked a departure form it. Four major parallel government were established during the movement Balliya-UP, Tamluk- Bengal, Satara-Maharastra and Talcher-Orissa.
After September 1942 on account of increasing British repression, the movement event underground. It now took the shape of revolutionary activities. The prominent leaders of the underground activities were Achyut Patwardhan, Aruna Asaf Ali, Ram Manohar Lohia, etc.
The most significant act of underground activity was established of congress radio with Usha Mehta as the announcer. Tam Manohar Lohia used to regularly broadcast on this radio and radio continued till November 1942 when it was discovered and confiscated by the British police.
Muslim league kept a loop from the movement and gave the slogan divide and quit in 1943 Karachi Session. On 23rd March 1943 the league organized the celebration in the name of Pakistan Day.
Indian National Army and it's Significance
While the second world war was been fought, the INM found a new expression outside country's frontier in the form of INA founded on 17th Feb 1942 under the command of captain Mohan Singh and Indian Independence league by Ras Behari Bose
However, it was only after the arrival of Subash Chandra Bose form Germany to Japan in June 1943 that the INA was reorganized in the form of Azad Hind Fauj. Bose arrived in Singapore in July 1943 and took the charge of 12,000 strong INA on 4th July. Bose established two headquarters of INA in Rangoon and Singapore. He eastablished 4 regiments that is Gandhi Brigade, Nehru Brigade, Azad Brigade and Subash Brigade. Later he established all women regiment called Jhansi Regiment under the command of Captain Laxmi Swaminathan. On 21th October 1943 Subhash announced the formation of provisional government of free Indian at Singapore. He become the head of the state, PM and supreme commander of the Army of this government. The government got recognized by Japan, Italy and Germany.
The Japanese government handed over the command of Andaman and Nicobar Island to Subash who renamed them as Shaheed and Swaraj.
The INA surrendered to British in May 1945 following the defeat of the Japanese forces in Burma. Many INA soldiers were taken as the prisoners of war. Japan officially surrender on 15th August 1954. Subash died in a plane crash.
Although the INA adventure of freeing India with the help of Japan proved to be a failure in the immediate term, yet Subhash and his INA set before the people of India an example of courage and patriotism, which were both inspiring and dignifying.
When British government announced to hold a public trial of INA soldiers, there was a wave of national protest and massive demonstration all over the country. The trial only helped to arouse the people's patriotic sentiment.
INA struggle marked the revival of revolutionary extremism in India, while the mainstream national movement had been largely characterized by non-violent resistance under the leadership of Gandhiji. The approach of Bose thus presented a departure from this strategy.
Bose believed that independence could be achieved more quickly through direct military action against the British.
The legacy of INA and Subhash Chandra Bose's leadership had a lasting impact on Indian armed forces after independence. INA's emphasis on discipline, unity, and patriotism influenced the development of Indian military ethos in the post-independence era.
RIN Revolt
Royal Indian Navy mutiny of 1946 was a significant event in the India's struggle for freedom from British rule. This mutiny involved over 20,000 soldiers and 78 ships began on the 18 Feb 1946 primarily as the protest against the conditionary and the treatment of the sailors in the Navy. However, it quickly escalated into a nationwide movement with wide-ranging implication for the British colonial regime.
The mutiny demonstrated clearly to the British that their most reliable pillar power that is Indian Armed Forces could no longer be dependent. The participation of naval ratings who were considered to be the most more disciplined and politically involved highlight the influence of the nationalist sentiments among the Indian soldiers in British Army.
The mutiny significantly changed the British calculation about their ability to maintain control over India. It prompted an urgent evaluation of their long-term strategy for India. The British government led by the PM Atley was now convinced that it was necessary to speed up the process of transfer of power.
The cabinet mission was sent in March 1946 just weeks after the mutiny to discuss the plan the end of British rule India.
Integration of Princely States into Union of India
In 1947 the future of princely states once the British left become a matter of concern. Many of the larger princely states claim that paramountcy cannot be transferred to the new states of India and Pakistan.
There aspirations were fuelled by British PM Clement Atlee's announcement on 20th February 1927 that his majestic government do not intend to handover the powers and obligations under paramountcy to any government of British India. Consequently, the rulers of several states claimed that they would become independent from 15th August 1947 when British rule end.
However, Congress wanted the integration of native states into Union of India. This is because the nationalist leadership could hardly accept a situation where the unity of independent India would be endangered by hundreds of large or small independent or autonomous states within the boundary of Indian dominion. Besides the people of native states had participated in the process of nation making and have developed a strong feeling of Indian nationalism. The nationalist leadership in British India and princely states rejected the claim of any state and repeatedly declared that the only option opened for the state is to aced to India or Pakistan on the basis of contiguity and its territory and wishes of the people.
The integration of princely states into the newly formed dominion of India was a complex and challenging process. At the time of independence in 1947 India consisted of British ruled territories called British India (under the direct rule) and the princely states (ruled by local monarch). Many rulers of princely states resisted integration because it meant loosing their privileges and autonomy. These rulers have enjoyed absolute authority over their territory for centuries and were reluctant to give up their power to the central government.
In some states the local rulers and nobles led resistance movement against integration notable among there were Bhopal, Travancore, Hyderabad, Junagadh and Kashmir.
Each princely state had it's own administrative system of laws and governance practices. Integrating these diverse system into a unify national framework required significant adjustment and standardization.
Many princely states were geographically fragmented and scattered within British Indian territories which necessitate territorial reorganization to create viable territorial units. State Reorganization Commission was setup in 1953 to address these issues eventually leading to reorganisation of states on linguistic grounds in 1953.
The economies of the princely states were often underdeveloped and isolated. Integrating these economics into the national economic framework required the infrastructural development, investment and economic reforms.
India is a country of immense ethnic linguistic and cultural diversity and this was particularly pronounced in the princely states. Integrating these states into a unified nation while respecting their unique cultural identities was a significant socio-cultural challenge. In fact some princely states in the north-eastern region such as Manipur, Tripura and parts of Assam had significant tribal population with distinct practices and social structure ensuring that these tribal communities were not marginalized in the integration process required special constitutional provisions such as 6th Schedule which provided for ADC to protect tribal autonomy.
Sardar Patel's Role in Integration of Princely states
Sardar Patel handled effectively the task of integration of princely states with his diplomatic skills and foresightedness. He followed carrot and stick policy. He made it clear to ruler of princely states that he does not....
He also appealed to the patriotic and nationalist sentiment of the princess and invited them to join democratic constitution in the national interest.
By tactful methods such as promising privy purse, through his friendly advice and sometime by strong appeal he could succeed in bringing all the rulers together and merging their state into the Indian Union without blood shed. He believed that will of people supreme and sovereignty resist not with king but with people.
Patel gave a personal touch to issues of princely states by considering the princes as his friends and was sure that his appeal would impact the minds of native rulers his tactful approach to the princes paved the way for merger of princely states.
Patel's scheme for integration was also based upon convincing the states to sign the Instrument of Accession and standstill agreement. Instrument of Accession was the legal document that facilitated the accession of princely states to India. This document allows the state to retain control upon various areas such as culture, defence, administration while surrendering.
Standstill Agreement signed with princely states as a temporary administrative agreement designed to maintain the status-quo of the princely state existing administrative and economic relations with British India until a final decision is made regarding the integration.
By the end of 1949 Patel had succeeded in integrating the vast majority of princely states into Indian Union. This achievement was monumental as it ensure political and territorial integrity of Indian preventing fragmentation territory into multiple independent sovereign unity.